[client com] ICANN Bylaws Matrix

[Gregory, Holly]

Consider whether CWG should submit a comment on this.



Sent with Good (www.good.com)

________________________________
From: Jonathan Robinson
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 03:20:11 PM
To: Gregory, Holly; Flanagan, Sharon; 'Client Committee'
Subject: RE: [client com] ICANN Bylaws Matrix

Thank-you Holly,

No, there is no specific project in mind. Save for the fact that I think it would be good practice for the CWG to confirm this to the CCWG before the end of the public comment period.
The CWG receiving confirmation from Sidley that you remain satisfied that our dependencies will be met will be a useful basis for the CWG to confirm that with the CCWG.

I hope that clarifies.

Jonathan

From: Gregory, Holly [mailto:holly.gregory at sidley.com]
Sent: 17 August 2015 13:07
To: jrobinson at afilias.info; Flanagan, Sharon <sflanagan at sidley.com>; 'Client Committee' <cwg-client at icann.org>
Subject: RE: [client com] ICANN Bylaws Matrix

Jonathan, this issue is very much on our minds in the work for the CCWG and the CWG.  Could you clarify whether there is a specific project you have in mind?   Holly.



Sent with Good (www.good.com<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.good.com&d=AwMFAg&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=1-1w8mU_eFprE2Nn9QnYf01XIV88MOwkXwHYEbF2Y_8&m=ifvTlIyctW2Z6Ms4euhtUuhB1JlgMp_yBbEXu2vlMWc&s=RbaCtAoPWevPrzhubt0vc_p5IJ337VfF4n0UFMP9k2E&e=>)

________________________________
From: cwg-client-bounces at icann.org<mailto:cwg-client-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Jonathan Robinson
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 02:12:07 AM
To: Flanagan, Sharon; 'Client Committee'
Subject: Re: [client com] ICANN Bylaws Matrix
Sharon,

Thank-you for this work. There is a related point we need to check with you please.

As the CCWG work progresses from the current draft and to include any modifications based on the public comment period, the CWG needs to be sure that the CWG dependencies remain met by the CCWG proposal.
Is this something you are doing as a matter of course? We assume so but need to check whether or not you require specific instructions to this effect and if so, an indication of the cost.

Best wishes,



Jonathan

From: Flanagan, Sharon [mailto:sflanagan at sidley.com]
Sent: 11 August 2015 15:43
To: Client Committee <cwg-client at icann.org<mailto:cwg-client at icann.org>>
Subject: [client com] ICANN Bylaws Matrix

Dear All,

Attached is a draft matrix summarizing the proposed ICANN bylaw changes that relate to CWG’s final proposal.

Could you please forward to the CWG?

Thanks

SHARON FLANAGAN
Partner
Sidley Austin LLP
555 California Street
Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94104
+1.415.772.1271
sflanagan at sidley.com<mailto:sflanagan at sidley.com>
www.sidley.com<http://www.sidley.com>




****************************************************************************************************
This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us
immediately.

****************************************************************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-client/attachments/20150818/9462cbf6/attachment-0001.html>