[client com] Request for a quote on two tasks

[Lise Fuhr]

Hi Greg and Maarten,

 

The chairs recommend that we proceed with the two issues – the matrix and the IPR on the basis of the two quotes. Do you have any objections to this? Please indicate your position on this as soon as possible and at the latest on Tuesday July 22nd .

 

If you agree to go ahead, we will let CWG know that this is our intention and then commission the work with Sidley right after.

 

Best,

Jonathan and Lise

 

Fra: Flanagan, Sharon [mailto:sflanagan at sidley.com] 
Sendt: 18. juli 2015 15:33
Til: cwg-client at icann.org; Jonathan Robinson; 'Lise Fuhr'; Grace Abuhamad; Marika Konings
Cc: Gregory, Holly; Hofheimer, Joshua T.
Emne: RE: Request for a quote on two tasks

 

Dear All,

 

With respect to Item #1 below, we would expect the stress test and assessment of the IPR issue under the three scenarios below would require approximately $35,000-40,000 of legal work.  This would be for our analysis and review and would not include time spent on follow up calls or iterations of the document.

 

Please let us know if you have any questions.

 

Best regards,

Sharon

 

SHARON FLANAGAN
Partner

Sidley Austin LLP
+1.415.772.1271
sflanagan at sidley.com

 

From: Lise Fuhr [mailto:lise.fuhr at difo.dk] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 6:58 AM
To: Flanagan, Sharon
Cc: Jonathan Robinson; Grace Abuhamad; Marika Konings; cwg-client at icann.org
Subject: Request for a quote on two tasks

 

Dear Sharon,

 

As we talked about during the Client Committee call last Thursday, we have discussed with the CWG Sidley's eventual advice regarding two issues – IPR and a matrix of the bylaws. The CWG agreed to request Sidley to give an estimate of the hours needed in order to perform the two tasks:

1.       IPR - To conduct a stress-test approach regarding the IANA IPR issue. This includes four aspects:

a.  Sidley should consult with ICANN Legal in order to obtain further insight and background to the IPR issue. This can be done with the involvement of other members of the CWG – like the Client Committee. Furthermore CWG is considering involving other communities in this fact-gathering exercise.

b. There appear to be three possible scenarios. IANA’s IPR either:
(i) stays with ICANN; (ii) goes to PTI; or (iii) goes into trust (IETF, mutual trust). 

c. What risks exist with each approach from a CWG-Stewardship perspective. These need to be evaluated in view of ICANN's position and the proposal from the other communities to determine what is optimal and/or acceptable. 

d. There are 3 trademarks involved: (i) "Internet Assigned Numbers Authority," (ii) "IANA", and (iii) the IANA Logo, which consists of IANA in stylized letters plus Internet Assigned Numbers Authority.

 

2.       Matrix of the ICANN bylaws:

Create a matrix to help determine where the bylaws that are needed in relation to the CWG proposal belong.  Identify which bylaws Sidley would suggest that the CWG should draft (be in charge of having drafted), and which bylaws drafted by the CCWG need to be signed off by the CWG. There will be a part of the bylaws that are being prepared by the CCWG that have no direct relationship to the CWG's work and these constitute a third category. 

 

After receiving the quote, the Client Committee will evaluate the estimates of the two tasks and get back to you.

 

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to get back to me.

 

Best regards,

 

Lise

 

****************************************************************************************************
This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us
immediately.

****************************************************************************************************

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-client/attachments/20150720/9ec2dcff/attachment.html>