[client com] Instructions to Sidley

Gregory, Holly holly.gregory at sidley.com
Wed Jun 3 20:44:37 UTC 2015


This message was in error. Please disregard.



Sent with Good (www.good.com)

________________________________
From: Gregory, Holly
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 03:38:02 PM
To: Lise Fuhr; jrobinson at afilias.info; cwg-client at icann.org
Subject: RE: [client com] Instructions to Sidley

My phone is on a my husbands card. How do we submit?



Sent with Good (www.good.com)

________________________________
From: cwg-client-bounces at icann.org on behalf of Lise Fuhr
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 03:29:06 PM
To: jrobinson at afilias.info; cwg-client at icann.org
Subject: Re: [client com] Instructions to Sidley

Hi All,
I can confirm the understanding.
Best,
Lise

Fra: cwg-client-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-client-bounces at icann.org] På vegne af Jonathan Robinson
Sendt: 3. juni 2015 17:22
Til: Client
Emne: [client com] Instructions to Sidley
Prioritet: Høj

All,

Following discussions within the CWG last week, and again yesterday, it seems essential that we communicate effectively with Sidley in three areas:


1.       The CWG’s requirements in order to finish the proposal

2.       The CWG’s requirements to support the proposal in B.A.

3.       The CWG’s potential requirements post B.A. and/or with implementation

Arguably, the current scope of work deals with 1 & 2 above and we have not yet properly scoped or discussed 3.
Of 1 & 2 above, 1 is clearly most urgent so I’ll concentrate on that here.

N.B. Our current plan is to have the final reading of the proposal in tomorrow’s CWG meeting

It is my understanding that we need to secure the following from Sidley in advance of concluding the final proposal for send-off next week.


A.      A form of language which effectively captures the conditional nature of the proposal i.e. that the proposal is valid if and only if adequate accountability mechanisms
(as currently contemplated by the CWG in conjunction with the CCWG) are in place at the time of the transition (or failing that or irrevocably committed to being in place within a defined and agreed timeframe).

B.      A confirmation around the use (or not) of the ICANN bylaws (golden?) as described in the CWG proposal in order to capture the necessary components of the CWG proposal that need to be enshrined in the ICANN bylaws

C.      A confirmation that the final proposal is consistent with Sidley’s advice given to date and, to the extent that it is not, what changes are required.

Please can you confirm this understanding as soon as possible in order that this position and associated instructions can be communicated to Sidley as soon as possible.

Given that I believe tomorrow’s scheduled Client Committee meeting is leaving it too late, I have taken the opportunity to directly communicate this draft scope of final instructions (A-C above) to Holly & Sharon so that they are on notice that we are working it up.

Thank-you for your prompt attention to this.



Jonathan



****************************************************************************************************
This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us
immediately.

****************************************************************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-client/attachments/20150603/60d12833/attachment.html>


More information about the Cwg-client mailing list