[client com] CWG Proposal Wording from Call

[Flanagan, Sharon]

Hi Grace and Marika,

Attached is precise rewording on the one issue we discussed.  This should capture the desire to use “both” without introducing ambiguities.

Best,
Sharon



SHARON FLANAGAN
Partner
Sidley Austin LLP
555 California Street
Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94104
+1.415.772.1271
sflanagan at sidley.com<mailto:sflanagan at sidley.com>
www.sidley.com<http://www.sidley.com>
[http://www.sidley.com/files/upload/signatures/SA-autosig.png]<http://www.sidley.com/> SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP




****************************************************************************************************
This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us
immediately.

****************************************************************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-client/attachments/20150611/e7108a32/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Doc1.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 23446 bytes
Desc: Doc1.docx
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-client/attachments/20150611/e7108a32/Doc1-0001.docx>