[client com] FW: [CWG-Stewardship] Notes, Recordings, Transcript CWG IANA #44 - 5 May

Wed May 6 12:35:26 UTC 2015

Dear Client Committee,
I¹m forwarding you the notes and actions from yesterday¹s meeting, where
your action item to update the punch list was assigned.
Best, 
Grace

From:  Brenda Brewer <brenda.brewer at icann.org>
Date:  Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 8:25 AM
To:  "cwg-stewardship at icann.org" <cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
Subject:  [CWG-Stewardship] Notes, Recordings, Transcript CWG IANA #44 - 5
May

Dear all, 

The notes, recordings and transcripts for the CWG IANA Call #44  5 May are
available here:  
https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=53772821
Action Items
Action (Sidley): revise the punch list and republish (removing AoC review
question; and renaming 'separation review' to 'separation processs';
add DT-F's authorization of RZM changes)

Action (Grace): make clear the link to proposal on the public comment page
Notes
Useful Links for CWG-Stewardship

·       View submissions received (3 so far):
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-cwg-stewardship-draft-proposal-22apr15
/ 
<http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-cwg-stewardship-draft-proposal-22apr1
5/> 
·       Public comment webpage:
https://www.icann.org/public-comments/cwg-stewardship-draft-proposal-2015-04
-22-en 
<https://www.icann.org/public-comments/cwg-stewardship-draft-proposal-2015-0
4-22-en> 
·       Webinar announcement: https://community.icann.org/x/V4E0Aw
<https://community.icann.org/x/V4E0Aw>
Notes for meeting #44:

1. Opening remarks

·       This is a management call to agree on outstanding issues and who is
dealing with them, etc. The goal is to get everyone on the same page.
·       We need to continue working during the public comment, but
incorporate the submissions at the same time.
·       Have been asked to do additional webinars and there will be two more
tomorrow. Please make sure to recirculate the announcement so that we can
get as much attendance as possible.
2. CCWG dependencies and the new CCWG draft proposal

·       CCWG-Accountability published their draft yesterday:
https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ccwg-accountability-draft-proposal-201
5-05-04-en 
<https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ccwg-accountability-draft-proposal-20
15-05-04-en> . 
·       Chairs coordinated with the CCWG-Acct chairs and Sidley to make sure
that the CWG-Stewardship dependencies were properly addressed.
·       CCWG-Acct will be on Thursday call and we can ask them questions
directly then (meeting #45).
3. Sidley¹s Punch List (including DT-A and DT-F status)

·       Punch List highlights priority items for discussion (as part of
refining the CWG proposal)
·       Some areas of work can be best dealt with by existing DTs, but
chairs were relunctant to create new DTs and/or spread the work out to all
DTs considering the timeline.
·       Three big issues: determining PTI legal status; determining size and
composition of PTI Board; and determining scope of PTI Board role.
·       Discussion on integrating IFR into the AoC review structure --> the
IFR is not an AoC review per se, but it's a review of the same standing as
the AoC reviews (it's a comparison).
·       DT-C will address questions assigned to it.
·       DT-M will also address their questions
·       DT-A will continue its work and address its questions as part of its
work
·       Note that "Separation Review" will be renamed "Separation Process".
Possible creation of a Design Team to work on separation process as an
exception. Avri will lead the group, with some help from DT-N, but no need
to create new mailing list for the work.
·       DT-F will reconvene to address authorization of RZM changes
Action (Sidley): revise the punch list and republish (removing AoC review
question; and renaming 'separation review' to 'separation processs'; add
DT-F's authorization of RZM changes)

4. Section IV

Staff to draft sections IV, V, VI, taking input and guidance from CWG on
mailing list and during CWG meetings.

5. Public comments

·       3 comments received so far.
·       PTI as a separate entity is getting most feedback. Some think it's
not helpful and some think it's not separate enough.
·       Staff will propose a public comment template/ work approach for
meeting on Tuesday next week.
Action (Grace): make clear the link to proposal on the public comment page

6. AOB

No issues raised. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-client/attachments/20150506/8543b418/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 92 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-client/attachments/20150506/8543b418/image001-0001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5035 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-client/attachments/20150506/8543b418/smime-0002.p7s>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: ATT00001.txt
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-client/attachments/20150506/8543b418/ATT00001-0001.txt>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5108 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-client/attachments/20150506/8543b418/smime-0003.p7s>