[client com] FW: [CWG-Stewardship] Update on post Special IFR Separation Process

[Grace Abuhamad]

Forwarding the latest DT-N/ DT-SR update per Sharon¹s request.

On 5/19/15, 12:34 AM, "Avri Doria" <avri at acm.org> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>In addition to the discussions on the list, the remnants of the DT-N
>group had a call to try and resolve the issues. And then did a bunch of
>editing.  We think we have simplified it somewhat.  We did continue to
>make the recommendation that it be done by a group that was different
>than the S-IFR group that recommended the initiation of the separation
>process, despite the fact that some consider this counter to common
>sense.  As far as we could tell the larger group was split on this issue
>and we gave weight to the consideration that as a checks-and-balances
>measure,  the group that recommends an RFP be created not be the one
>creating and running the RFP.
>
>In terms of the composition of the separation process group, which we
>called Separation Cross-Community WG (SCWG) it has pretty much the same
>multistakeholder mix as the IFR, with a slight favoring of Registries,
>but representation from all stakeholder groups/ACSO.  Again a
>compromise.  The makeup of the SCWG, however, is a wider issue and might
>need further CWG-IANA discussion to reach an annealing point.  We
>decided to base it loosely on the IFR team composition, which is already
>in public comment.
>
>Attached is the latest revision of that process.  The file remains in
>the drive document and remains open for comment.
><https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WvBqtgXJ7rNrbN-5Tjf5-gi80aZ2oRYDtF_JL
>rETRqg/edit?usp=sharing>
>
>After so many attempts, there is no certainty of having the right mix
>this time.  But there is hope.
>
>The primary authors were Greg, Stephanie and myself.
>
>We also have created a punch list response table that is still being
>worked on.  It can be found at:
><https://docs.google.com/document/d/13jmdqJkl1X292h9kqjQcYh7gcAW81XhektbeM
>xADosE/edit?usp=sharing>
>
>avri
>
>
>
>
>---
>This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>http://www.avast.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: SeparationProcess(4)-150519.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 134872 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-client/attachments/20150519/b3abfc57/SeparationProcess4-150519-0001.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: ATT00001.txt
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-client/attachments/20150519/b3abfc57/ATT00001-0001.txt>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5108 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-client/attachments/20150519/b3abfc57/smime-0001.p7s>