[client com] Actions for Sidley coming out of CWG IANA Meeting #64 -- 2 September 2015

Thu Sep 3 16:51:18 UTC 2015

Dear Sidley, 

The CWG had a call today where they discussed next steps. There are two
action items that refer to Sidley¹s work. I¹m forwarding you the notes and
the link to the transcript and recording for you to review (highlighted
below). If you listen to the Adobe Connect recording, please start your
recording at about 1h into the call to save time. I can help point you to
the exact part of the recording if needed.

Best, 
Grace

From:  <cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Brenda Brewer
<brenda.brewer at icann.org>
Date:  Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 9:34 AM
To:  "cwg-stewardship at icann.org" <cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
Subject:  [CWG-Stewardship] Notes, Recordings, Transcript CWG IANA Meeting
#64 -- 2 September 2015

Dear all, 

The notes, recordings and transcripts for the CWG IANA Meeting # 64 on 02
September 2015 will be available here:  https://community.icann.org/x/D5FCAw

A copy of the notes and action items may be found below.

Kind regards,
Brenda

Action Items
Action: text should read e.g ICANN Board not i.e. ICANN board
Action: adjust p.15, A4 so that it is consistent with the rest of the
document (and on page 8)
Action: circulate redline of those changes so that the document can be
approved at next XWG meeting
Action: finalize question of billing management at the next meeting.
Action: refer Sidley to transcript and audio at this point of the meeting
(about 1h into the call) so that they can incorporate the discussion on
budget into their Public Comment drafting work.
Action: Sidley to consider whether the scope of the enhanced IRP is adquate
to cover PTI decisions.
Notes
1. Opening remarks
* Calls scheduled every two weeks
* Since the last meeting, the Chairs have submitted a clarification on the
IANA IPR issue (to the ICG).
* SLEWG has done their work -- thank you!
* Client Committee has met to discuss Bylaws and an update will be provided
in #3
2. Review of SLEWG output
·       Thank you to SLEWG for really hard work!
·       After ratification, IANA staff will develop plan for testing and
implementation (with NTIA approval since ICANN is still under contract)
·       Principles were approved by the CWG earlier in they year
·       Key point in "Assumptions": ensure that each element of IANA's work
is measured
Martin Boyle questions/review:
·       has concerns on the process to approve changes in new regime (p.8
and p.15) -- not clear where the responsibility for authorization lies
"externally". Is the external party the ICANN Board or PTI Board or another?
This is particularly important in the case of ccTLD delegations.
·       --> for gTLDs the ICANN Board is the external party. For ccTLDs, the
situation is different: third party only confirms process is followed.
·       Second question is about emergency changes (p.17) -- what was this
just as a note and did not appear in the table?
·       Status tracker  reporting on p. 14 -- is this a general service that
can be made available to all TLDs?
Action: text should read e.g ICANN Board not i.e. ICANN board
Action: adjust p.15, A4 so that it is consistent with the rest of the
document (and on page 8)
Action: circulate redline of those changes so that the document can be
approved at next XWG meeting
Next Steps: 
·       Timing is of concern so Chairs will need to monitor testing &
implementation 
·       Proposal will not be re-submitted to the ICG since this work was
known to be done following submission and based on principles that are in
the proposal. 
·       Formal ratification will occur at next CWG meeting.
3. Update on legal work
* Client Committee has not met in a while (since 9 July), but met earlier
this week to review current and potential future work
* Sidley has produced a Bylaws matrix and is itimately versed with the work
of the CWG and CCWG, so we'd like to request them to draft the Bylaws.
* CCWG and CWG have different drafting processes: the CCWG has ICANN holding
the pen on the first draft, while the CWG has Sildey holding the pen.
* A coordination meeting will be held on Friday between the CWG,CCWG, Sidley
and ICANN to commence work.
* Sidley will track and report on whether the CWG requirements are being
met, and continue to be met, by the CCWG work.
* Did touch on the issue of financial control and management. Chairs have
planned to follow up with ICANN on this. Sidley has requested that the
detailed billing (not the overall billing) is kept confidential. The Client
Committee has the option of seeing the billing confidentially, but needs
authorization of the CWG to do so. Any comments?
* Notes, recordings, transcripts from the meeting are posted here:
https://community.icann.org/x/MoBCAw <https://community.icann.org/x/MoBCAw>
. 
Action: finalize question of billing management at the next meeting.
4. Update on CCWG-Accountability related issues
IANA Functions budget:
·       is this subject to a veto or approval? Our intention was to have one
or the other, and the CCWG has proposed the veto option. Confirming that
this "veto" meets our requirements.
·       Martin suggests the ICANN-IFO contract contain an item about the
budget to ensure responsibility
·       The CWG needs to be vigilant regarding the implementation. Jonathan
raises the question about role of group in implementation
Action: refer Sidley to transcript and audio at this point of the meeting
(about 1h into the call) so that they can incorporate the discussion on
budget into their Public Comment drafting work.
Appeals mechanism: Attention given to ccTLDs ability to appeal issues (not
related to delegations/redelegation until the ccTLDs determine a process for
that). 
Action: Sidley to consider whether the scope of the enhanced IRP is adquate
to cover PTI decisions.
SCWG: No action required. CCWG has reviewed the issue and aware of the
community mechanism needed to apply to the SCWG in the future.
5. AOB
Proposal for another CWG meeting next week at 17:00 UTC in order to address
the Sidley draft of public comment submission to CCWG and ratify the SLEWG
document. 
6. Closing remarks
Close, see you next week

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-client/attachments/20150903/f998329a/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 92 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-client/attachments/20150903/f998329a/image001-0001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 378 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-client/attachments/20150903/f998329a/image002-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5035 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-client/attachments/20150903/f998329a/smime-0002.p7s>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: ATT00001.txt
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-client/attachments/20150903/f998329a/ATT00001-0001.txt>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5108 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-client/attachments/20150903/f998329a/smime-0003.p7s>