[client com] Input requested regarding Paragraph 106 of CWG Proposal

Flanagan, Sharon sflanagan at sidley.com
Sat Apr 16 01:28:50 UTC 2016

Dear All,

There is language in the CWG proposal at paragraph 106 regarding budget approvals that refers to:  “The community may reject the ICANN Budget based on perceived inconsistency with the purpose, mission and role set forth in ICANN’s Articles and Bylaws, the global public interest, the needs of ICANN stakeholders, financial stability or other matters of concern to the community.”

We’re requesting confirmation that the Mission of ICANN as set forth in the Bylaws is synonymous with the “purpose, mission and role” of ICANN as set forth in ICANN’s Articles and Bylaws for purposes of the CWG proposal.  The concern is that “purpose” and “role” are otherwise ambiguous and not defined, whereas the Mission is carefully articulated.



555 California Street
Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94104
+1 415 772 1271
sflanagan at sidley.com<mailto:sflanagan at sidley.com>

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-client/attachments/20160416/1cd6da2c/attachment.html>

More information about the Cwg-client mailing list