[client com] Fwd: FW: Revised Community Agreement Draft: 08-05-2016
Greg Shatan
gregshatanipc at gmail.com
Mon Aug 8 22:33:45 UTC 2016
Client Committee,
I am forwarding a series of emails relating to comments by Kavouss Arasteh
on the Community Agreement. While there were numerous emails on the
subject, I will only forward those that are of substantive interest to this
group and which potentially aid Sidley in advising the CWG on these
comments, should it be determined that Sidley should undertake such review
and advice. This first email contains the comments.
Greg
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 4:37 PM
Subject: Re: FW: Revised Community Agreement Draft: 08-05-2016
To: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
Cc: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>, Andrew Sullivan <
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>, "cwg-stewardship at icann.org" <
cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
Dear All,
No matter who made the changes, I am commenting on the text not on the
author's identity.
I have had to convert the PDF in word and have done my verifications and
attached my comments
There are serious problems in some of the terms.
I have indicated all in terms of deletion with reasons and/or with comments
in round bracket.
Regartds
Kavouss
2016-08-07 20:15 GMT+02:00 Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>:
> The changes were not made by me. The changes were made by the CWG's
> counsel and the IETF Trust's counsel working collaboratively, which came
> after discussion of the IANA IPR collaborative group (including reps of all
> the communities and the Trust).
>
> I don't have the redline in Word. I sent to the list everything that was
> initially sent by the IETF Trust's counsel to CWG's counsel to the Client
> Committee list.
>
> Greg
>
>
> On Sunday, August 7, 2016, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear ALL
>>
>> I HAVE no comments on the initial text before being changed
>> Regards
>> Kavouss
>>
>> 2016-08-07 18:04 GMT+02:00 Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Seun
>>> NO
>>> PLS DO NOT MAKE MY JOB HARD..
>>> WHY NOT A RED MARK WORD VERSION
>>> Regards
>>> Kavouss
>>>
>>>
>>> 2016-08-07 17:42 GMT+02:00 Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> Hello Kavous,
>>>>
>>>> An option could be that you look at the PDF and make your comment on
>>>> the word version(though you can make comment on the pdf as well)
>>>>
>>>> Another option is if you (or someone) has the previous clean version
>>>> then one can produce a redline off the two clean versions.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my LG G4
>>>> Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>>>>
>>>> On 7 Aug 2016 4:37 p.m., "Kavouss Arasteh" <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear Andrew,
>>>>> Tks again for your kind reply.
>>>>> Please send me a red mark Word Version and I Will reply today.
>>>>> I HAVE SOME CONCERS ON SOME OF THE CHANGED MADE BY GREC
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Kavouss
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2016-08-07 17:28 GMT+02:00 Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't know whetheer you will get that before tomorrow, and that is
>>>>>> really rather late. Can you at least say what your concerns are?
>>>>>> There really isn't a lot of time: this needs to go to public comment
>>>>>> on Thursday. An additional day to wait for the comments would be bad.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 05:14:50PM +0200, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
>>>>>> > Seun,
>>>>>> > I know that a word version was included but the Word Version is a
>>>>>> clean
>>>>>> > Text and it is difficult to identify the changes .I wish to see
>>>>>> what was
>>>>>> > the changes introduced by Greg
>>>>>> > I still need the red mark text in WORD VERSION.
>>>>>> > Regards
>>>>>> > Kavouss
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > 2016-08-07 14:09 GMT+02:00 Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > A word version was included in Greg's mail
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > Regards
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > Sent from my LG G4
>>>>>> > > Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > On 7 Aug 2016 10:36 a.m., "Kavouss Arasteh" <
>>>>>> kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
>>>>>> > > wrote:
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > >> Grec,
>>>>>> > >> Thank you very much for the amendments. I do not agree with some
>>>>>> of them
>>>>>> > >> In order to enable me to provide my counter comments to you, pls
>>>>>> provide
>>>>>> > >> a word version of your amendment as soon as convinient
>>>>>> > >> Regards
>>>>>> > >> Kavouss
>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>> > >> 2016-08-07 0:22 GMT+02:00 Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>:
>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>> > >>> CWG,
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> I am forwarding a revised draft of the proposed Community
>>>>>> Agreement
>>>>>> > >>> relating to the IANA IPR. In addition to any other comments
>>>>>> you may have,
>>>>>> > >>> I draw your attention to the two specific items in the email
>>>>>> below: (1)
>>>>>> > >>> identifying an entity to sign for the names community, and (2)
>>>>>> providing a
>>>>>> > >>> brief description of the IANA Services used by the names
>>>>>> community (
>>>>>> > >>> *see* Exhibit A for descriptions provided by the other
>>>>>> communities).
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> This will be the subject of further refinement by the IPR
>>>>>> collaborative
>>>>>> > >>> group early in the week, with the goal of initiating a public
>>>>>> comment
>>>>>> > >>> period as soon as possible after the CWG-IANA meeting on
>>>>>> Thursday.
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> Greg
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>> > >>> From: Hofheimer, Joshua T. <jhofheimer at sidley.com>
>>>>>> > >>> Date: Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 4:55 PM
>>>>>> > >>> Subject: [client com] FW: Revised Community Agreement Draft:
>>>>>> 08-05-2016
>>>>>> > >>> To: Client <cwg-client at icann.org>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> Dear Client Committee,
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> Attached please find a revised draft of the proposed Community
>>>>>> Agreement
>>>>>> > >>> for your review and comment. This is an iterative version
>>>>>> prepared jointly
>>>>>> > >>> by counsel (Sidley) to the CWG and counsel to the IETF Trust to
>>>>>> reflect the
>>>>>> > >>> 7-point discussion items. To be clear, it is still a work in
>>>>>> progress, but
>>>>>> > >>> we believe ready for the CWG to have an opportunity for review.
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> Two important issues to highlight:
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> 1) the Names Community needs to determine who will be the
>>>>>> signatory
>>>>>> > >>> party, acting on behalf of the Names Community, to the Community
>>>>>> > >>> Agreement. For your information, the attached draft has the
>>>>>> organizations
>>>>>> > >>> put forward to represent the Numbers and Protocols Communities;
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> 2) we need a brief description of the IANA services to be
>>>>>> provided on
>>>>>> > >>> behalf of the Names Community. The following high-level
>>>>>> description was
>>>>>> > >>> included in a draft of the Naming Functions Agreement. If this
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> > >>> acceptable for including here is well, please advise (or we ask
>>>>>> the Client
>>>>>> > >>> Committee to provide a sufficient description):
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> The “*IANA Naming Function*” is comprised of:
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> (a) Management of the DNS Root Zone (“*Root Zone
>>>>>> Management*
>>>>>> > >>> ”);
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> (b) Management of the .INT top-level domain;
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> (c) Maintenance of a repository of
>>>>>> internationalized
>>>>>> > >>> domain name tables and label generation rule sets; and
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> (d) Provision of other services related to the
>>>>>> management
>>>>>> > >>> of .INT top-level domains, at ICANN’s reasonable request and at
>>>>>> ICANN’s
>>>>>> > >>> expense.
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> Please provide any comment or feedback as soon as practical, as
>>>>>> we are
>>>>>> > >>> trying to finalize the draft for approval by the various
>>>>>> stakeholders and
>>>>>> > >>> release for public comment by Thursday.
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> Thank you in advance.
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> Cheers,
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> Josh
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> *Joshua Hofheimer*
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> *Sidley Austin LLP*
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> *jhofheimer at sidley.com <jhofheimer at sidley.com>*
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> *(213) 896-6061 <%28213%29%20896-6061> (LA direct)*
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> *(650) 565-7561 <%28650%29%20565-7561> (Palo Alto direct)*
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> *(323) 708-2405 <%28323%29%20708-2405> (cell)*
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> *From:* iana-ipr-bounces at nro.net [mailto:iana-ipr-bounces at nro.n
>>>>>> et] *On
>>>>>> > >>> Behalf Of *Jorge Contreras
>>>>>> > >>> *Sent:* Friday, August 05, 2016 10:01 AM
>>>>>> > >>> *To:* iana-ipr at nro.net
>>>>>> > >>> *Subject:* [Iana-ipr] Revised Community Agreement Draft:
>>>>>> 08-05-2016
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> All – attached is a draft of the Community Agreement that Josh
>>>>>> and I
>>>>>> > >>> have collaborated on over the past two days. We believe that
>>>>>> it reflects
>>>>>> > >>> the current requirements of the parties, and submit it for your
>>>>>> review and
>>>>>> > >>> discussion.
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> A clean version, as well as a marked version against the draft
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> > >>> 07-30-16 (in PDF format) are attached.
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> Please note a few items that still need to be completed,
>>>>>> including the
>>>>>> > >>> description of the IANA Names Service, the identities of the CCG
>>>>>> > >>> representatives, etc.
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> Best regards,
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> Jorge
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> Jorge L. Contreras
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> Contreras Legal Strategy LLC
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> 1711 Massachusetts Ave. NW, No. 710
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> Washington, DC 20036
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> contreraslegal at att.net
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> The contents of this message may be attorney-client privileged
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> > >>> confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please
>>>>>> delete this
>>>>>> > >>> message immediately.
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> ************************************************************
>>>>>> > >>> ****************************************
>>>>>> > >>> This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information
>>>>>> that is
>>>>>> > >>> privileged or confidential.
>>>>>> > >>> If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail
>>>>>> and any
>>>>>> > >>> attachments and notify us
>>>>>> > >>> immediately.
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> ************************************************************
>>>>>> > >>> ****************************************
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> > >>> Cwg-client mailing list
>>>>>> > >>> Cwg-client at icann.org
>>>>>> > >>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-client
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> > >>> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>>>>>> > >>> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>>>>>> > >>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>>
>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>> > >> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> > >> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>>>>>> > >> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>>>>>> > >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>>> > CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>>>>>> > CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>>>>>> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Andrew Sullivan
>>>>>> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-client/attachments/20160808/8c0239a2/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Community-Agreement - 08-05-2016 marked against 07-30-2016,KA.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 287404 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-client/attachments/20160808/8c0239a2/Community-Agreement-08-05-2016markedagainst07-30-2016KA-0001.docx>
More information about the Cwg-client
mailing list