[client com] [Iana-ipr] Possible Signatory for Names Community in Community Agreement

[Greg Shatan]

I see now that all of the signature blocks are still essentially "generic"
and do not identify entities (except the block the IETF Trust).  As such,
the names community block should remain generic as well.  The versions that
Jorge sent around about half-hour ago are set up that way, so we should be
good to go.

Greg

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Gregory, Holly <holly.gregory at sidley.com>
wrote:

> I don’t think you need to do it in the signature block
>
>
>
> *HOLLY J. GREGORY*
> Partner and Co-Chair, Global Corporate Governance & Executive Compensation
> Practice
>
>
> *SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP *+1 212 839 5853
> holly.gregory at sidley.com
>
>
>
> *From:* Greg Shatan [mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 11, 2016 2:30 PM
> *To:* Jorge Contreras
> *Cc:* iana-ipr at nro.net; Flanagan, Sharon; Client; Gregory, Holly;
> Hofheimer, Joshua T.
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Iana-ipr] Possible Signatory for Names Community in
> Community Agreement
>
>
>
> Good question.  I would make the parallel change to the signature block.
>
>
>
> Greg
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Jorge Contreras <contreraslegal at att.net>
> wrote:
>
> I have made this change.  I assume no change to the signature block at
> this point?
>
>
>
> Jorge L. Contreras
>
> Contreras Legal Strategy LLC
>
> 1711 Massachusetts Ave. NW, No. 710
>
> Washington, DC 20036
>
> contreraslegal at att.net
>
>
>
> The contents of this message may be attorney-client privileged and
> confidential.  If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this
> message immediately.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *<iana-ipr-bounces at nro.net> on behalf of Greg Shatan <
> gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, August 11, 2016 at 11:42 AM
> *To: *<iana-ipr at nro.net>
> *Cc: *"Flanagan, Sharon" <sflanagan at sidley.com>, Client <
> cwg-client at icann.org>, "Gregory, Holly" <holly.gregory at sidley.com>,
> Joshua Hofheimer <jhofheimer at sidley.com>
> *Subject: *Re: [Iana-ipr] Possible Signatory for Names Community in
> Community Agreement
>
>
>
> All:
>
>
>
> One further change, suggested by Sidley and in which I concur.  The
> preamble should read:
>
>
>
>  ​[the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, on behalf of
> the names community]
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Greg
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> All,
>
>
>
> ​The CWG will move forward with ICANN as a possible signatory to the
> Community Agreement.  ​
>
>
>
> ​The preamble to the Community Agreement should delete the blank
> underscore before ("Names Community") and replace it with ​[the Internet
> Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers].  To be clear, the square
> brackets should appear in the document.
>
>
>
> This should be accompanied by a footnote, which will have the following
> text:
>
>
>
>
>
> CWG-Stewardship is considering the appropriate entity to be the signatory
> to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names Community.  At the
> request of the CWG-Stewardship, ICANN has indicated that it could serve as
> the counterparty to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names
> Community and ICANN has been included in this draft.  ICANN (or another
> counterparty) would be subject to process and criteria as determined by
> CWG-Stewardship.
>
>
>
> ​If you have any questions, please respond to this email.  Thanks!
>
>
>
> Greg​
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list
> Iana-ipr at nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.nro.net_mailman_listinfo_iana-2Dipr&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=1-1w8mU_eFprE2Nn9QnYf01XIV88MOwkXwHYEbF2Y_8&m=C9aDiv8Kh2B53CQnp0rIIUQY7ma5dJiThLWn5T7zKAY&s=M8quUNHoqWVtmKeGN2x1ajx8gI7lUPPnzKGk_e840U8&e=>
>
>
>
>
>
> ************************************************************
> ****************************************
> This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is
> privileged or confidential.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any
> attachments and notify us
> immediately.
>
> ************************************************************
> ****************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-client/attachments/20160811/25cedef0/attachment-0001.html>