[client com] [Iana-ipr] Possible Signatory for Names Community in Community Agreement

[Greg Shatan]

Good question.  I would make the parallel change to the signature block.

Greg

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Jorge Contreras <contreraslegal at att.net>
wrote:

> I have made this change.  I assume no change to the signature block at
> this point?
>
> Jorge L. Contreras
> Contreras Legal Strategy LLC
> 1711 Massachusetts Ave. NW, No. 710
> Washington, DC 20036
> contreraslegal at att.net
>
> The contents of this message may be attorney-client privileged and
> confidential.  If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this
> message immediately.
>
>
> From: <iana-ipr-bounces at nro.net> on behalf of Greg Shatan <
> gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
> Date: Thursday, August 11, 2016 at 11:42 AM
> To: <iana-ipr at nro.net>
> Cc: "Flanagan, Sharon" <sflanagan at sidley.com>, Client <
> cwg-client at icann.org>, "Gregory, Holly" <holly.gregory at sidley.com>,
> Joshua Hofheimer <jhofheimer at sidley.com>
> Subject: Re: [Iana-ipr] Possible Signatory for Names Community in
> Community Agreement
>
> All:
>
> One further change, suggested by Sidley and in which I concur.  The
> preamble should read:
>
>  ​[the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, on behalf of
> the names community]
>
> Thanks!
>
> Greg
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> ​The CWG will move forward with ICANN as a possible signatory to the
>> Community Agreement.  ​
>>
>> ​The preamble to the Community Agreement should delete the blank
>> underscore before ("Names Community") and replace it with ​[the Internet
>> Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers].  To be clear, the square
>> brackets should appear in the document.
>>
>> This should be accompanied by a footnote, which will have the following
>> text:
>>
>>
>> CWG-Stewardship is considering the appropriate entity to be the signatory
>> to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names Community.  At the
>> request of the CWG-Stewardship, ICANN has indicated that it could serve as
>> the counterparty to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names
>> Community and ICANN has been included in this draft.  ICANN (or another
>> counterparty) would be subject to process and criteria as determined by
>> CWG-Stewardship.
>>
>> ​If you have any questions, please respond to this email.  Thanks!
>>
>> Greg​
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list
> Iana-ipr at nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-client/attachments/20160811/f8daf268/attachment.html>