[client com] [Iana-ipr] Possible Signatory for Names Community in Community Agreement
gregshatanipc at gmail.com
Thu Aug 11 18:29:49 UTC 2016
Good question. I would make the parallel change to the signature block.
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Jorge Contreras <contreraslegal at att.net>
> I have made this change. I assume no change to the signature block at
> this point?
> Jorge L. Contreras
> Contreras Legal Strategy LLC
> 1711 Massachusetts Ave. NW, No. 710
> Washington, DC 20036
> contreraslegal at att.net
> The contents of this message may be attorney-client privileged and
> confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this
> message immediately.
> From: <iana-ipr-bounces at nro.net> on behalf of Greg Shatan <
> gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
> Date: Thursday, August 11, 2016 at 11:42 AM
> To: <iana-ipr at nro.net>
> Cc: "Flanagan, Sharon" <sflanagan at sidley.com>, Client <
> cwg-client at icann.org>, "Gregory, Holly" <holly.gregory at sidley.com>,
> Joshua Hofheimer <jhofheimer at sidley.com>
> Subject: Re: [Iana-ipr] Possible Signatory for Names Community in
> Community Agreement
> One further change, suggested by Sidley and in which I concur. The
> preamble should read:
> [the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, on behalf of
> the names community]
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
>> The CWG will move forward with ICANN as a possible signatory to the
>> Community Agreement.
>> The preamble to the Community Agreement should delete the blank
>> underscore before ("Names Community") and replace it with [the Internet
>> Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers]. To be clear, the square
>> brackets should appear in the document.
>> This should be accompanied by a footnote, which will have the following
>> CWG-Stewardship is considering the appropriate entity to be the signatory
>> to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names Community. At the
>> request of the CWG-Stewardship, ICANN has indicated that it could serve as
>> the counterparty to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names
>> Community and ICANN has been included in this draft. ICANN (or another
>> counterparty) would be subject to process and criteria as determined by
>> If you have any questions, please respond to this email. Thanks!
> _______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list
> Iana-ipr at nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Cwg-client