[client com] Signatory to the Community Agreement

[Greg Shatan]

A related question is how the Names Community would authorize ICANN (or
another entity) to sign on its behalf. One member of the CWG believes this
would require the CWG to become an unincorporated association to do so. I
tend to think it could be done by CWG or by SO/ACs working within the ICANN
structure.  Perhaps some thought can be given to this as well.

Downstream questions include how will the Names Community control the
signatory's actions (e.g., will this fall to its CCG reps?), how will its
CCG reps be chosen and controlled, and what is the Names Community?

Greg

On Wednesday, August 17, 2016, Flanagan, Sharon <sflanagan at sidley.com>
wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> We will work today to prepare this table. I believe we can have that ready
> for the call tonight our time.
>
> Best regards,
> Sharon
>
>
> Sharon R. Flanagan
> Sidley Austin LLP
> SF tel: 415-772-1271
> PA tel: 650-565-7008
> Email: sflanagan at sidley.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','sflanagan at sidley.com');>
>
>
> *From*: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jrobinson at afilias.info
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jrobinson at afilias.info');>]
> *Sent*: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 03:24 AM
> *To*: Flanagan, Sharon; Hofheimer, Joshua T.
> *Cc*: Gregory, Holly; Client <cwg-client at icann.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cwg-client at icann.org');>>
> *Subject*: Signatory to the Community Agreement
>
>
> Dear Sidley,
>
>
>
> As you are aware:
>
>
>
> 1.      A key issue for the CWG in dealing with the IANA IPR will be a
> decision on the signatory on behalf of the Names Community.
>
> 2.      Currently we have some potential options:
>
> a.      ICANN as signatory (assuming ICANN is willing)
>
> b.      The formation of an unincorporated entity (a to be defined)
>
> c.      Other possibilities such as the Empowered Community
>
>
>
> It will be helpful to the CWG to have some structured input on this,
> possibly in the form of a table, in order to inform and aid that decision.
>
> Please can you provide such input and/or advice and indicate if this will
> be possible at the meeting of the CWG scheduled for tomorrow (18 August) @
> 06h00 UTC.
>
>
>
> Thank-you,
>
>
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> (on behalf of the Client Committee)
>
>
>
> ************************************************************
> ****************************************
> This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is
> privileged or confidential.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any
> attachments and notify us
> immediately.
>
> ************************************************************
> ****************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-client/attachments/20160817/9a7703c9/attachment.html>