[client com] IANA IPR License & Community Agreement Template

Sat Jul 23 01:09:40 UTC 2016

I'm going home now.

Greg

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Finally, I attach a cumulative redline, showing all changes to the
> original draft circulated by the IETF Trust.
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> For convenience, I'm also attaching clean and marked versions, marked to
>> show changes to Sidley's revised draft.
>>
>> Greg
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 8:47 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Attached in track changes are my comments to the Community Agreement.
>>>
>>> We should endeavor to harmonize and conform this to the License
>>> Agreement.  I've done this in a few places, but please keep an eye out for
>>> other instances.
>>>
>>> Greg
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 7:29 PM, Hofheimer, Joshua T. <
>>> jhofheimer at sidley.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Client Committee and Greg, etc. – We have accepted Greg’s changes and
>>>> made a few further clean-up revisions.  For convenience we have included a
>>>> clean and redline marked against the original draft sent to us.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regarding the final changes:
>>>>
>>>> ·        we’ve deleted footnotes that have now become moot,
>>>>
>>>> ·        fixed the formatting,
>>>>
>>>> ·        edited footnotes per Greg’s comments,
>>>>
>>>> ·        moved a couple of Greg’s margin notes into footnotes (e.g.,
>>>> his query about IETF being an Affiliate), and
>>>>
>>>> ·        made a few text edits for consistency (e.g. changing
>>>> unreasonably “denied” to “withheld” to be consistent with other parts of
>>>> the document).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If the Client Committee is satisfied, I am happy for this to go to IETF
>>>> so they can review in advance of our call on Tuesday.  We can discuss in
>>>> the morning.  For me the most material issue, which impacts the document in
>>>> several places is whether the IETF should have the unilateral right to
>>>> assess or require changes in services, and terminate the license if
>>>> unsatisfied with those changes.  As we’ve noted previously, we don’t
>>>> believe that is appropriate, but will take CWG’s guidance.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I know we have a brief client committee call scheduled for tomorrow
>>>> morning on IPR, so we can discuss this and any other issues, as well as
>>>> next steps.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Josh
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Joshua Hofheimer*
>>>>
>>>> *Sidley Austin LLP*
>>>>
>>>> *jhofheimer at sidley.com <jhofheimer at sidley.com>*
>>>>
>>>> *(213) 896-6061 <%28213%29%20896-6061> (LA direct)*
>>>>
>>>> *(650) 565-7561 <%28650%29%20565-7561> (Palo Alto direct)*
>>>>
>>>> *(323) 708-2405 <%28323%29%20708-2405> (cell)*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Greg Shatan [mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com]
>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, July 21, 2016 12:31 AM
>>>> *To:* Hofheimer, Joshua T.
>>>> *Cc:* Client Committee; Greeley, Amy E.
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [client com] IANA IPR License & Community Agreement
>>>> Template
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Client Committee and Josh et al.,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have reviewed Sidley's comments on the License Agreement and
>>>> generally agree with them. I have further revised the License Agreement in
>>>> the attached document, both to carry out certain of Sidley's comments, to
>>>> reflect comments of my own and to follow more closely the Principal Terms.
>>>> My changes are marked in track changes.  I look forward to any thoughts you
>>>> may have.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This version (subject to any further comments or discussions, and
>>>> clean-up and consolidation by Sidley) should be turned back to the IETF
>>>> Trust and other operational communities sufficiently in advance of the July
>>>> 26 call so that this version can form the basis of the discussions on that
>>>> call.  Thoughts on process are most welcome.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I hope to review the Community Agreement shortly.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Greg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [image:
>>>> https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0B90h5wcghspFRXc1T05BaVZVbjg&revid=0B90h5wcghspFUEtGZS9IQ1F4cXp3WTcrSnZFRjhwQjlCZTN3PQ]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Gregory S. Shatan | Partner *McCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP
>>>>
>>>> 245 Park Avenue, 27th Floor | New York, New York 10167
>>>> T: 212-609-6873
>>>> C: 917-816-6428
>>>> F: 212-416-7613
>>>> gshatan at mccarter.com | www.mccarter.com
>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.mccarter.com_&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=PyftdYkqjEDMIx5o_kyQ1bCTTkOV655ea67oiCGUI9M&m=jGb5LGH4BqHpi1_m20_6zLmaPnAhvTzZvPUSI0AP_HY&s=h6C_aTMsBA2TkJLnOBapQL4Eci3VrfFGtDW_MPcMDH4&e=>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> BOSTON | HARTFORD | STAMFORD | NEW YORK | NEWARK
>>>> EAST BRUNSWICK | PHILADELPHIA  | WILMINGTON | WASHINGTON, DC
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 1:28 AM, Hofheimer, Joshua T. <
>>>> jhofheimer at sidley.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dear Client Committee,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Attached please find Sidley comments to the IANA IPR License and to the
>>>> Community Agreement, clean and redline against the original drafts we
>>>> received from Greg Shatan.  Please note there are several questions and
>>>> comments for consideration included as footnote “Notes to Draft”.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We are happy to discuss at your convenience.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Josh
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *JOSHUA T. HOFHEIMER*
>>>> Partner
>>>>
>>>> *SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP*
>>>> +1 650 565 7561 (PA direct)
>>>> +1 213 896 6061 (LA direct)
>>>> +1 323 708 2405 (Cell)
>>>> jhofheimer at sidley.com
>>>> www.sidley.com
>>>>
>>>> *[image: SIDLEY]*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ****************************************************************************************************
>>>> This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is
>>>> privileged or confidential.
>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any
>>>> attachments and notify us
>>>> immediately.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ****************************************************************************************************
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Cwg-client mailing list
>>>> Cwg-client at icann.org
>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-client
>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_cwg-2Dclient&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=PyftdYkqjEDMIx5o_kyQ1bCTTkOV655ea67oiCGUI9M&m=jGb5LGH4BqHpi1_m20_6zLmaPnAhvTzZvPUSI0AP_HY&s=tfiAKbpwpJ2MvPRPz7CqobnbkwjkuURx5ZT5_FUbNlc&e=>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-client/attachments/20160722/075a771b/attachment-0001.html>