<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><div>Dear all, </div><div><br></div><div>Here are the notes from the call today: </div><div><br></div><div><p style="margin: 0px; font-size: 11px; line-height: normal; font-family: Helvetica;">Notes:<span style="font-size: 10.5px; line-height: normal;"> </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0px; font-size: 11px; line-height: normal; font-family: Helvetica; min-height: 13px;"><br></p>
<p style="margin: 0px; font-size: 11px; line-height: normal; font-family: Helvetica;">Maarten Simon sends apologies</p>
<p style="margin: 0px; font-size: 11px; line-height: normal; font-family: Helvetica; min-height: 13px;"><br></p>
<p style="margin: 0px; font-size: 11px; line-height: normal; font-family: Helvetica;"><b>1. CWG Dependencies (on CCWG proposal)</b></p>
<ul><li><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 11px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none;">Sidley has the dependencies letter in the works and hopes to get it to CWG today. </span></li><li><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 11px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none;">Notes the significant change in the 3rd draft (from Member model to Designator model). This change makes the powers indirectly enforceable. Sidley's recommendation is that this is sufficient, but the CWG will also need to make that determination. </span></li><li><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 11px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none;">Express to the CCWG that it's important to specially consider CWG comments, especially if the comment has been made before (and not addressed). </span></li><li><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 11px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none;">This is not simply a response to the Public Comment, it's a check on the requirements for the process. </span></li><li><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 11px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none;">Concern about tone affecting working relationship with the Chairs (e.g. ambush feeling)</span></li></ul>
<p style="margin: 0px; font-size: 11px; line-height: normal; font-family: Helvetica; min-height: 13px;"><b style="color: rgb(4, 51, 255);">Action:</b><span style="color: rgb(4, 51, 255);">Invite one person from Sidley team to the CWG call on Tuesday (at 16:00 UTC) to allow them to present.</span><span style="color: rgb(4, 51, 255);"> </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0px; font-size: 11px; line-height: normal; font-family: Helvetica; color: rgb(4, 51, 255); min-height: 13px;"><br></p>
<p style="margin: 0px; font-size: 11px; line-height: normal; font-family: Helvetica; color: rgb(4, 51, 255);"><b>Action:</b>Greg to send sentence to Sidley on the requirements of the CWG. </p>
<p style="margin: 0px; font-size: 11px; line-height: normal; font-family: Helvetica; color: rgb(4, 51, 255); min-height: 13px;"><br></p>
<p style="margin: 0px; font-size: 11px; line-height: normal; font-family: Helvetica;"><b>2. New ICANN Bylaws derived from the work of the CWG</b></p>
<ul><li><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 11px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none;">Sidley presented the Bylaws. For the "notes to the CWG" staff compiled questions for the CWG to answer. CWG suspended its work in anticipation of shorter, more simplified Bylaws.</span></li><li><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 11px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none;">Sidley suggests, that instead of simplifying Bylaws at the outset, work on the questions and then decide what needs to be Bylaws and what can be 'policies' and included elsewhere. </span></li></ul>
<p style="margin: 0px; font-size: 11px; line-height: normal; font-family: Helvetica; color: rgb(4, 51, 255);"><b>Action:</b>CWG to make a first pass at the questions and then come back to the lawyers with a smaller, more focused, group to finalize. </p>
<p style="margin: 0px; font-size: 11px; line-height: normal; font-family: Helvetica; color: rgb(4, 51, 255); min-height: 13px;"><br></p>
<p style="margin: 0px; font-size: 11px; line-height: normal; font-family: Helvetica;"><b>3. ICANN implementation of PTI (legal entity, articles, bylaws etc.)</b></p>
<ul><li><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 11px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none;">ICANN implementation team has put forth a plan for the operationalization of the proposals. They are preparing, while not implementing until signoff from the USG. </span></li><li><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 11px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none;">Ok if ICANN holds the pen/ does first pass, but Sidley will need to review the PTI Bylaws at some stage. There are some details that are not 'off the shelf' per se. </span></li></ul>
<p style="margin: 0px; font-size: 11px; line-height: normal; font-family: Helvetica; color: rgb(4, 51, 255);"><b>Action:</b>propose to ICANN that they approach the implementation of PTI in various stages. Seek agreement on principles before starting the drafting phase. </p>
<p style="margin: 0px; font-size: 11px; line-height: normal; font-family: Helvetica; color: rgb(4, 51, 255); min-height: 13px;"><br></p>
<p style="margin: 0px; font-size: 11px; line-height: normal; font-family: Helvetica;"><b>4. AOB</b></p>
<ul><li><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 11px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none;">Greg suggests that DT-IPR may need external legal work. </span></li></ul></div><div><br></div></body></html>