<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Email from Chuck Gomes to co-chairs.</div><div class="gmail_quote">---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>From: <b class="gmail_sendername">Gomes, Chuck</b> <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:cgomes@verisign.com">cgomes@verisign.com</a>></span><br>Date: Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 1:22 PM<br>Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Revised Community Agreement Draft: 08-05-2016<br>To: Arasteh <<a href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a>>, Jari Arkko <<a href="mailto:jari.arkko@piuha.net">jari.arkko@piuha.net</a>><br>Cc: "<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a>><br><br><br>Jonathan/Lise,<br>
<br>
You are probably ahead of me but, if there is time in our CWG call this week, it might be a good idea to discuss Kavouss's comments. Allowing the 'experts' to respond to his comments and other CWG members to discuss as well might help although I am not sure he will easily concede. It would at least document the discussion in a very visible way.<br>
<br>
I of course will respect your decision on how to handle this.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
Chuck<br>
</font></span><span class="im HOEnZb"><br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: <a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org">cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.<wbr>org</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org">cwg-stewardship-<wbr>bounces@icann.org</a>] On Behalf Of Arasteh<br>
</span><span class="im HOEnZb">Sent: Monday, August 08, 2016 12:46 PM<br>
To: Jari Arkko<br>
Cc: <a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
</span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Revised Community Agreement Draft: 08-05-2016<br>
<br>
Dear Jari<br>
I have made many comments during public comment period for CCWG. Non of them were consulted???<br>
<br>
Sent from my iPhone<br>
<br>
> On 8 Aug 2016, at 18:44, Jari Arkko <<a href="mailto:jari.arkko@piuha.net">jari.arkko@piuha.net</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
><br>
>> That does not mean that my comments be ignored<br>
><br>
> No, of course not. What I said was that we have more time to consider additional comments during the public comment period.<br>
><br>
> Jari<br>
><br>
><br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
CWG-Stewardship mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
CWG-Stewardship mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><br>
</div></div></div><br></div>