[CWG-DT-Stewardship] Latest draft for call at 13:00 UTC

[Jonathan Robinson]

Thanks Grace,

 

Look forward to meeting with you all then.

 

Jonathan

 

From: cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Grace Abuhamad
Sent: 11 August 2014 04:43
To: Julie Hammer; CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org
Subject: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] Latest draft for call at 13:00 UTC

 

Hello all, 

 

In advance of our call, I'm circulating an updated version of the draft
charter including both Julie's suggested edits from 8 August and the
rewording from 10 August (see below). 

 

Talk to you all at 13:00 UTC, 

Grace

 

From: Julie Hammer <julie.hammer at bigpond.com>
Date: Sunday, August 10, 2014 5:38 PM
To: "CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org" <CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] V6 of the ICG charter

 

Good morning again Everyone, 

 

Apologies for bombarding you with even more but I figure it's best to let
you have a think about any proposed amendments in advance of our meeting
tonight.

 

In discussions on this topic with our SSAC Chair (Patrik Fältström), he made
the comment that he is not exactly sure which entities might have 'working
groups' as such in the parameter and numbering communities.  While this is
probably a very minor point for our draft Charter, it is relevant to the
following dot point under the heading 'Goals and Objectives':

 

·       Meet with the IETF and NSO working groups developing parallel
transition proposals to explain the CWGs work and remain up to date on their
progress;

 

Perhaps this might be reworded:

 

·       Meet with other working groups developing parallel transition
proposals, especially for parameters and numbering resources, to explain the
CWGs work and remain up to date on their progress;

 

This is less restrictive wording and hopefully allows for all situations.

 

Talk tonight.

 

Cheers,  Julie

 

On 9 Aug 2014, at 10:57 am, Julie Hammer <julie.hammer at bigpond.com> wrote:

 

Hi Avri and Everyone, 

 

Many thanks for bringing this draft to our attention.  I had a quick look at
it and agree that it highlighted a couple of things that we might tweak in
our CWG draft Charter.

 

In particular, I thought that the following points in the ICG draft Charter
were worth incorporating more clearly in ours:

 

ICG Draft Charter Page 3 Section (i) Liaison and

"...to coordinate which community will develop a transition proposal for
each area of overlap (eg., special-use registry)."

ICG Draft Charter Page 4 Section (ii) Assessment

"The ICG might at some point detect problems with the component proposals.
At that point, the role of the ICG is to communicate that back to the
relevant communities so that they (the relevant communities) can address the
issues."

I have tried to address both these issues by adding words under the section
Section III:  Deliverables, Timeframes, and Reporting in No 9 on the list of
work plan deliverables, which now reads: 

"9.     A process and timeline for communicating with the ICG, including a
process for:

a)   Agreeing any additions requested by the ICG to the scope of the
Transition Proposal.  For example, the ICG may request the CWG or one of its
chartering organizations to develop a transition proposal for a particular
area of overlap (eg., special-use registry; and

b)   Resolving any problems detected by the ICG between other component
proposals and this CWG Transition Proposal;"

 

ICG Draft Charter Page 4 Section (ii) Assessment

"Each proposal should be submitted with a clear record of how consensus has
been reached for the proposal in the community"

I have added this as sub-para c) under the heading 'Final Transition
Proposal'.

 and

"and provide an analysis that shows the proposal is in practice workable." 

I have added the sentence "This proposal must provide an analysis that shows
that it is in practice workable." at the end of the first para under the
heading "Deliverables"

 

These changes have been incorporated in the attached updated version of our
draft Charter.

 

Cheers,  Julie

 

<DT Charter Template - redline - 8 August 2014 jmh2.doc>

 

On 9 Aug 2014, at 8:21 am, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:

 

Hi,


https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-08-en
<
https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/draft-charter-coordination-group
-17jun14-en.pdf>

Do we need any tweaks to accommodate their charter.  I think we might
need a few, but I don't think they are fundamental, though perhaps
procedural.

On a first read, I think their charter is rather ok.  Though, I may find
things to bicker about on further delving.

avri
_______________________________________________
CWG-DT-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-dt-stewardship

 

_______________________________________________
CWG-DT-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-dt-stewardship

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-dt-stewardship/attachments/20140811/c7f477cc/attachment.html>