[CWG-DT-Stewardship] Proposed Agenda and latest version of charter for review

Mon Aug 11 15:51:36 UTC 2014

Hi Allan, all, 

After consultation with staff, we'd like to suggest a more generic phrasing
of "ICANN will provide sufficient staff support to support the activities of
the CWG." This allows for shifting if necessary.

As you noted, I put a placeholder in the draft charter for the resourcing
text, but I misunderstood the place for the request. I will remove that
placeholder in the next redline.

Thank you, 
Grace

From:  Allan MacGillivray <allan.macgillivray at cira.ca>
Date:  Monday, August 11, 2014 10:36 AM
To:  Julie Hammer <julie.hammer at bigpond.com>, "CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org"
<CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org>
Subject:  Re: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] Proposed Agenda and latest version of
charter for review

Hi everyone  I said that I would draft some words on resourcing.  My sense
from the call was that the text of the charter is not the place to make the
actual request, but rather that Jonathan and Byron would do this by letter.
With this understanding, I propose the following words:

The chairs of this charter¹s drafting team, Jonathan Robinson and Byron
Holland, will write to ICANN seeking reasonable travel resources for CWG
members to participate in face-to-face CWG meetings, but on the
understanding that the CWG will make every effort to hold any face-to-face
meetings concurrent, or in conjunction with regularly scheduled ICANN
meetings.

Grace  the text on staff assignments in the resourcing section also needs
to be completed.  In an effort to get a final draft by Wednesday, could you
help me get some language in here.  I don¹t know if staff members are to be
identified by name or whether more generic language is commonly used e.g. a
minimum of x number of staff resources.  Could suggest something?

Thanks

Allan

From: cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hammer
Sent: August-11-14 10:09 AM
To: CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] Proposed Agenda and latest version of
charter for review

Hi Everyone,

I propose that the first sentence in the section titled 'Goals and
Objectives' be amended to read:

The primary goal of the Cross Community Working Group to Develop an IANA
Stewardship Transition Proposal (CWG) will be to produce a consolidated
transition proposal for the elements of the IANA Functions relating to the
Domain Name System.  That proposal may include options for specific features
within it, provided that each option carries the same level of consensus
from the CWG. 

Cheers,  Julie

On 11 Aug 2014, at 6:44 pm, Jonathan Robinson
<jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com> wrote:

Thanks Marika and CWG Colleagues,

The agenda below is the one I expect we will now follow.

As proposed a little over a week ago and also below, I think the realistic
way to work through the charter in the time allocated for the call is to
seek objections to / concerns with the current wording.

To the extent that members are OK with the wording, we¹ll take that as read.

Many thanks to those who have contributed to getting this in such good shape
over a relatively short time,

Talk with you all at 13h00 UTC.

Jonathan

From: cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: 08 August 2014 12:22
To: CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org
Subject: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] Proposed Agenda and latest version of charter
for review

Dear All,

Please find below the proposed agenda for Monday's DT meeting, subject to
revisions by the co-chairs and input from the DT. Having discussed this with
Jonathan, we would like to encourage you to identify any other items beyond
those listed in agenda item 2 that in your view need to be further discussed
by the DT  we will operate under the assumption that apart from those items
already identified and additional items that may get flagged prior to the
meeting, the current language / proposed edits as in the latest version of
the charter as attached are acceptable by all and do not need further
discussion. 

Please note that in the attached version (based on the version that Julie
sent earlier today), I've added some proposed wording to the 'additional
resources required' section to highlight that this is something the CWG
should preferably focus on at an early stage as it is unlikely that the DT
at this point in time will be in a position to identify what additional
resources the CWG may need.

If you have any comments and/or questions, please share those with the list.

Best regards,

Marika

Proposed Agenda  DT Meeting  Monday 11 August at 13.00 UTC
1. Welcome & roll call
2. Draft Charter - Review open items (membership, no consensus, additional
resources  DT members to identify which other sections / items need further
review ahead of the meeting)
3. Confirm deadline for final edits / comments with aim to have DT Chairs
submit charter to all SO/ACs by 14 August at the latest for consideration
4. Any next steps for the DT while SO/ACs consider the charter for approval?
5. AOB
6. Closure
_______________________________________________
CWG-DT-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-dt-stewardship

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-dt-stewardship/attachments/20140811/53d3da00/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5097 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-dt-stewardship/attachments/20140811/53d3da00/smime-0001.p7s>