[CWG-DT-Stewardship] For your review - latest version of charter & notes from meeting

[Jonathan Robinson]

All,

I would like to put in a placeholder to discuss resourcing in a little more
detail.  ICANN is committed to supporting this effort.

What do we need in terms of staff, face-to-face meetings and other
resourcing. 

A sketch of an indicative timeline for the working group could guide our
(and their) thinking here.
At least this would provide a couple of key indicators i.e. it could:
a. guide any volunteers who signed up for the WG
b. guide us / staff as to the resourcing requirements of the WG

Do others feel similarly?

Thanks,


Jonathan

-----Original Message-----
From: cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Burr, Becky
Sent: 22 July 2014 22:47
To: Avri Doria; cwg-dt-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] For your review - latest version of
charter & notes from meeting

I am good with Avri¹s comments/suggestions but I think we should avoid
calling members of the WG ³representatives² of their communities - we will
take the work product back to the communities, and yes the participants have
to be able to understand and articulate the concerns of their communities,
but some times there will be a range of views within a community.

Definitely agree best to avoid voting

Also agree that sub-group members should be identified from the membership
of the CWG - just thought it was a little unclear in the text.




J. Beckwith Burr
Neustar, Inc. / Deputy General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer
1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006
Office: + 1.202.533.2932  Mobile:  +1.202.352.6367  / becky.burr at neustar.biz
/ www.neustar.biz






On 7/22/14, 10:41 AM, "Avri Doria" <avri at acm.org> wrote:

>
>
>On 22-Jul-14 09:40, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>> Avri - Your name for the file indicates that you may have been 
>> working on the Academy WG around the same time.  :)
>
>actually just fumble fingering where i do a 'save as' and accidentally 
>press the wrong name.  the academy Wg file is from 2012.
>
>i have attached a copy with the correct file name, just for filing sake.
>
>thanks for noticing.
>
>avri
>
>> 
>> 
>> All good contributions Avri.
>
>thanks
>
>> 
>> I really like Avri's suggestion on the linkage between the 
>> Accountability effort and the IANA transition; see comment Ad10R9 on 
>> page 3.
>> 
>> I think she raises a very important question in comment Ad18R17 on 
>> page 4 :" Why would subgroups have different membership?"
>> 
>> I definitely think "we should avoid voting" as she says in comment
>> Ad26R25 on page 5.
>> 
>> On a different note, I suggest deleting the following comments from
>> me:  CG1 and CG16.
>> 
>> Chuck
>> 
>> Avri - Your name for the file indicates that you may have been 
>> working on the Academy WG around the same time.  :)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message----- From: cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
>> [mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria 
>> Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 11:28 PM To:
>> cwg-dt-stewardship at icann.org Subject: Re: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] For 
>> your review - latest version of charter & notes from meeting
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I have added a few more comments.
>> 
>> avri
>> 

_______________________________________________
CWG-DT-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-dt-stewardship