[CWG-DT-Stewardship] For your review - latest version of charter & notes from meeting

[Gomes, Chuck]

Thanks Marika.  In my opinion, the charter is coming along very well.

Before it gets too far along I want to throw out an idea that I have been thinking about for a while.

The ccTLD community and gTLD community have similar concerns with regard to IANA naming functions but there are issues that are also unique to each group.  So I have been wondering whether it might make sense for each community to be tasked with developing some initial proposals that would be proposed to the full CWG regarding their unique needs.  This early breakdown of work could be left to the CWG itself to consider or it could be part of the charter.  I do not have strong feelings one way or the other except that by including it in the charter, it might encourage the two communities to start working on proposals sooner.

I am assuming that both the GNSO and ccNSO will be modifying their processes and procedures so that stakeholders that are not yet a part of ICANN will also be able to participate.

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 6:47 AM
To: Avri Doria; cwg-dt-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] For your review - latest version of charter & notes from meeting

As the document still came up with the Academy WG name, I've taken the liberty to re-save the document under its original title, removed the comments that Chuck said could be removed and deleted the sentence 'and sub-working groups' to avoid any confusion over whether additional members would need to be appointed to sub-working groups. Please use this version to make any further comments / edits.

Best regards,

Marika

On 22/07/14 16:41, "Avri Doria" <avri at acm.org> wrote:

>
>
>On 22-Jul-14 09:40, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>> Avri - Your name for the file indicates that you may have been 
>> working on the Academy WG around the same time.  :)
>
>actually just fumble fingering where i do a 'save as' and accidentally 
>press the wrong name.  the academy Wg file is from 2012.
>
>i have attached a copy with the correct file name, just for filing sake.
>
>thanks for noticing.
>
>avri
>
>> 
>> 
>> All good contributions Avri.
>
>thanks
>
>> 
>> I really like Avri's suggestion on the linkage between the 
>> Accountability effort and the IANA transition; see comment Ad10R9 on 
>> page 3.
>> 
>> I think she raises a very important question in comment Ad18R17 on 
>> page 4 :" Why would subgroups have different membership?"
>> 
>> I definitely think "we should avoid voting" as she says in comment
>> Ad26R25 on page 5.
>> 
>> On a different note, I suggest deleting the following comments from
>> me:  CG1 and CG16.
>> 
>> Chuck
>> 
>> Avri - Your name for the file indicates that you may have been 
>> working on the Academy WG around the same time.  :)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message----- From: cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
>> [mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria 
>> Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 11:28 PM To:
>> cwg-dt-stewardship at icann.org Subject: Re: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] For 
>> your review - latest version of charter & notes from meeting
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I have added a few more comments.
>> 
>> avri
>>