[CWG-DT-Stewardship] For your review - latest version of charter & notes from meeting

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

I remote attended that session.  It was a good discussion.  It was
interesting to watch the evolution in the perception of some of the
issues as the meting went on.  There was also a good discussion going on
in the jabber room.

avri


On 24-Jul-14 15:49, Allan MacGillivray wrote:
> At the IETF BoF meeting this morning in Toronto, the IETF agreed to establish a working group on IANA transition.  Alissa Cooper made a presentation (available at http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/90/slides/slides-90-ianaplan-1.pptx ) which contains (page 11) a revised timeline for the ICG's work.  While it remains even 'draftier' than their charter, it nevertheless reflects some discussion that the ICG has apparently had since their meeting last week.  You will  note that in this timeline, they are no longer seeking a submission from  each community by the end of the year, but rather by Feb. 2, just before ICANN Marrakech.  But the end date has been moved to June to reflect the likelihood that the NTIA will have to run its own domestic consultation process, which would likely include some form of US Congressional scrutiny.  
> 
> Marika - could I ask you to remove the notes from me in the next version of the draft charter?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Allan
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
> Sent: July-24-14 6:47 AM
> To: Avri Doria; cwg-dt-stewardship at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] For your review - latest version of charter & notes from meeting
> 
> As the document still came up with the Academy WG name, I've taken the liberty to re-save the document under its original title, removed the comments that Chuck said could be removed and deleted the sentence 'and sub-working groups' to avoid any confusion over whether additional members would need to be appointed to sub-working groups. Please use this version to make any further comments / edits.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Marika
> 
> On 22/07/14 16:41, "Avri Doria" <avri at acm.org> wrote:
> 
>>
>>
>> On 22-Jul-14 09:40, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>>> Avri - Your name for the file indicates that you may have been 
>>> working on the Academy WG around the same time.  :)
>>
>> actually just fumble fingering where i do a 'save as' and accidentally 
>> press the wrong name.  the academy Wg file is from 2012.
>>
>> i have attached a copy with the correct file name, just for filing sake.
>>
>> thanks for noticing.
>>
>> avri
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> All good contributions Avri.
>>
>> thanks
>>
>>>
>>> I really like Avri's suggestion on the linkage between the 
>>> Accountability effort and the IANA transition; see comment Ad10R9 on 
>>> page 3.
>>>
>>> I think she raises a very important question in comment Ad18R17 on 
>>> page 4 :" Why would subgroups have different membership?"
>>>
>>> I definitely think "we should avoid voting" as she says in comment
>>> Ad26R25 on page 5.
>>>
>>> On a different note, I suggest deleting the following comments from
>>> me:  CG1 and CG16.
>>>
>>> Chuck
>>>
>>> Avri - Your name for the file indicates that you may have been 
>>> working on the Academy WG around the same time.  :)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message----- From: cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
>>> [mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria 
>>> Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 11:28 PM To:
>>> cwg-dt-stewardship at icann.org Subject: Re: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] For 
>>> your review - latest version of charter & notes from meeting
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have added a few more comments.
>>>
>>> avri
>>>
> 
> 
>