[CWG-DT-Stewardship] Update from the GNSO and draft call for observers for your review

Tue Sep 9 21:10:24 UTC 2014

Hi,

I agree.

And though the NCSG has not picked its rep yet, I hope they will have by
then.  I plan to partiicpate in any case either as a rep or a an
observer.  I suggest a similar tactic by others.

avri

On 05-Sep-14 09:25, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> I think a teleconference meeting in advance of L.A. and an in-person
> meeting in L.A. should both happen.  It would be negligent in my
> opinion to miss the opportunity for an in-person meeting in L.A. and
> a teleconference meeting before then, maybe two, would facilitate a
> better meeting in L.A.
> 
> Chuck
> 
> From: cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
> [mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika
> Konings Sent: Friday, September 05, 2014 8:48 AM To: Allan
> MacGillivray; Becky Burr; Bart Boswinkel;
> CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org Subject: Re: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] Update
> from the GNSO and draft call for observers for your review
> 
> Of course, nothing would prevent interested GAC members to join
> before that time as observers. If any of those observers are later
> selected as members, they can just be listed as such. Staff's idea
> was to try and schedule a first meeting of the CWG early October via
> conference call to allow for some initial introductions as well as
> discussions around the agenda for the F2F meeting in Los Angeles - do
> you all think that is feasible or should the first meeting happen in
> LA?
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Marika
> 
> From: Allan MacGillivray
> <allan.macgillivray at cira.ca<mailto:allan.macgillivray at cira.ca>> Date:
> Friday 5 September 2014 14:39 To: Becky Burr
> <Becky.Burr at neustar.biz<mailto:Becky.Burr at neustar.biz>>, Bart
> Boswinkel
> <bart.boswinkel at icann.org<mailto:bart.boswinkel at icann.org>>, Marika
> Konings <marika.konings at icann.org<mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>>,
> "CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org<mailto:CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org>"
> <CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org<mailto:CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org>> 
> Subject: RE: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] Update from the GNSO and draft call
> for observers for your review
> 
> I don't think the GAC is as advanced as us. I spoke briefly to
> Heather today and mentioned that the first meeting of the CWG would
> be on the Monday at ICANN 51.  I did not get the impression that they
> would have their representatives chosen, or even the charter approved
> by then.  I did emphasize the importance of having someone from the
> GAC at the meeting to signal solidarity.  She well understood the
> point but would not commit beyond saying that she would do what she
> could.  You probably know that he term as chair will end in Los
> Angeles and the GAC is currently running a process to choose her
> successor.
> 
> From: Burr, Becky [mailto:Becky.Burr at neustar.biz] Sent:
> September-05-14 8:23 AM To: Bart Boswinkel; Allan MacGillivray;
> Marika Konings;
> CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org<mailto:CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org> 
> Subject: Re: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] Update from the GNSO and draft call
> for observers for your review
> 
> What kind of proposal regarding the CCWG do we expect from the GAC??
> 
> J. Beckwith Burr Neustar, Inc. / Deputy General Counsel and Chief
> Privacy Officer 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006 
> Office: + 1.202.533.2932  Mobile:  +1.202.352.6367  /
> becky.burr at neustar.biz<mailto:becky.burr at neustar.biz> /
> www.neustar.biz<http://www.neustar.biz>
> 
> From: Bart Boswinkel
> <bart.boswinkel at icann.org<mailto:bart.boswinkel at icann.org>> Date:
> Friday, September 5, 2014 at 4:44 AM To: Allan MacGillivray
> <allan.macgillivray at cira.ca<mailto:allan.macgillivray at cira.ca>>,
> Marika Konings
> <marika.konings at icann.org<mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>>,
> "CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org<mailto:CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org>"
> <CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org<mailto:CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org>> 
> Subject: Re: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] Update from the GNSO and draft call
> for observers for your review
> 
> Hi Allan, Marika and I discussed timing. Currently most SO and Acs
> are looking for volunteers ( either as member or observer). Sending
> out a call for observers independent of this process may cause
> confusion, hence the idea to send out this general call for observers
> post closure of call for embers/observers from the SO and Acs (
> sometimes mid-September). Kind regards, Bart
> 
> 
> From: Allan MacGillivray
> <allan.macgillivray at cira.ca<mailto:allan.macgillivray at cira.ca>> Date:
> Friday, September 5, 2014 at 10:37 AM To: Marika Konings
> <marika.konings at icann.org<mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>>,
> "CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org<mailto:CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org>"
> <CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org<mailto:CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org>> 
> Subject: Re: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] Update from the GNSO and draft call
> for observers for your review
> 
> Thanks for the update Marika.  Heather Dryden, chair of the GAC, just
> sent Byron and Jonathan a message on where the GAC stands on the CWG.
> In it she said that "At this point I can express GAC's sincere
> interest in pursuing the matter, meaning that the GAC leadership will
> present a proposal regarding the Cross-Community Working Group for
> adoption by the GAC, followed by appointment of GAC participants. I
> will keep you posted on these developments from the GAC side in a
> timely manner."
> 
> So I think this completes the roundup of where the participating
> communities stand.  I take it that the October 13 meeting is now
> fixed.  Now it's up to the participating SO/AC's to finish the
> process of selecting members.  How would you foresee the call for
> observers you have prepared being distributed?  It would be useful
> for it to go out rather quickly so that the word might get out.
> 
> From:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces at icann.org<mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces at icann.org>
> [mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika
> Konings Sent: September-04-14 3:36 PM To:
> CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org<mailto:CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org> 
> Subject: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] Update from the GNSO and draft call for
> observers for your review
> 
> Dear All,
> 
> For your information, the GNSO Council adopted the CWG charter during
> its meeting today (see resolution below). The GNSO has requested that
> GNSO Stakeholder Groups provide the names of members for the CWG by
> 15 September at the latest and has recommended that the chairs of the
> DT serve as the interim chairs of the CWG until the CWG has had the
> opportunity to select its leadership.
> 
> In order to prepare for the call for observers, we've prepared the
> attached draft call that we would suggest is posted and circulated
> once most of the chartering organisations have appointed their
> members (we understand that the SSAC has already adopted the charter
> and the ALAC vote is finishing tomorrow). If you have any comments or
> suggestions, please feel free to share.
> 
> As your respective organisations identify their members for the CWG,
> please provide the information to Grace so that they can be added to
> the mailing list. We hope it will be possible to schedule a first
> meeting of the CWG in early October so the group can discuss whether
> or not it would like to meet in Los Angeles, and if so, what the
> agenda should be and what materials should be prepared, if any.
> 
> As you'll have noted from the announcement that Grace just shared,
> the ICG has requested that all formal responses are expected to be
> submitted by 31 December 2014.
> 
> We hope this is helpful.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Marika
> 
> ====================
> 
> Adoption of a Charter for a Cross Community Working Group to Develop
> an IANA Stewardship Transition Proposal on Naming Related Functions
> 
> Made by: Avri Doria
> 
> Seconded by: Amr Elsadr
> 
> Whereas,
> 
> 1.  The National Telecommunications and Information Administration
> (NTIA) has requested that ICANN "convene a multistakeholder process
> to develop a plan to transition the U.S. government stewardship role"
> with regard to the IANA Functions and related root zone management. 
> 2.  On June 6 2014, ICANN proposed the creation of an IANA
> Stewardship Transition Coordination Group (ICG) "responsible for
> preparing a transition proposal reflecting the differing needs of the
> various affected parties of the IANA functions." 3.  It was
> determined that the transition proposal should be developed within
> the directly affected communities (i.e. the IETF for development of
> standards for Internet Protocol Parameters; the NRO, the ASO, and the
> RIRs for functions related the management and distribution of
> numbering resources; and the GNSO and ccNSO for functions related to
> the Domain Name System). These efforts would inform the work of the
> ICG, whose responsibility would be to fashion an overall integrated
> transition proposal from these autonomously developed components. 4.
> Following distribution of an invitation to participate, a drafting
> team (DT) was formed with participants from the ccNSO, GNSO, SSAC and
> ALAC to develop a charter for a Cross Community Working Group to
> Develop an IANA Stewardship Transition Proposal on Naming Related
> Functions. 5.  The DT delivered the proposed charter for
> consideration to the ccNSO, GNSO, SSACC and ALAC (see [include link
> to proposed charter]).
> 
> Resolved,
> 
> 1.  The GNSO Council approves the Charter [include link] and appoints
> Jonathan Robinson as the GNSO Council liaison and member to the CWG. 
> 2.  Each GNSO Stakeholder Group will identify one member for the CWG
> by 15 September taking into account the charter requirement that best
> efforts should be made to ensure that members:
> 
> *   Have sufficient expertise to participate in the applicable
> subject matter; *   Commit to actively participate in the activities
> of the CWG on an ongoing and long-term basis; and *   Where
> appropriate, solicit and communicate the views and concerns of
> individuals in the organization that appoints them.
> 
> 3. The GNSO will collaborate with the other SOs and ACs to issue a
> call for observers to join the CWG, each in accordance with its own
> rules.
> 
> 4. Until the CWG selects its co-chairs for the CWG, the GNSO Council
> recommends that the co-chairs of the Drafting Team shall serve as the
> interim co-chairs of the CWG.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ CWG-DT-Stewardship
> mailing list CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org 
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-dt-stewardship
> 