[CWG-DT-Stewardship] Update from the ALAC on the charter adoption

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

Certainly viability and effectiveness, for some definkition of such
terms, of any new proposed solution is in scope, I would think.

Well it is an NTIA requirement that this be a no charge service.    At
the very least this will need to be stated as a continuing requirement,
assuming it is.

And part of the reason for NTIA actions is globalization.  Whether we
decide to recommend any globalization solutions or not and what they
entail, this too is something that we may want to discuss.

I am not sure that we needed the amendment, but on seeing that these
issues could be called out of scope by some, I guess it is worth the
discussing.

Since ALAC approved with an amendment the rest of us don't have,
something has to change somewhere to bring the charters into 100%
alignment.  either they have to drop it, or the rest have to accept it,
if I understand the situation correctly.

avri

On 12-Sep-14 08:28, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> I am having trouble seeing what they have to do with NTIA's role going away so I am just trying to understand that.
> 
> Chuck
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 10:48 PM
> To: cwg-dt-stewardship at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] Update from the ALAC on the charter adoption
> 
> Hi,
> 
> why isn't it in scope.
> 
>> Issues related to ensuring IANA's viabbility (sic) and effectiveness, 
>> are also within the scope of the CWG. Such issues could include, but 
>> are not limited to: Charging structure or the lack thereof and 
>> languages that IANA can function in.
> 
> 
> I would think that stability of the transition requires that such issues be in scope. In fact why wouldn't any issue having to do with IANA futures be in scope?
> 
> I am not sure we need the amendment, but I certainly don't see it as out of scope.
> 
> avri
> 
> 
> On 11-Sep-14 17:13, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>> Tijani,
>>
>> What does this addition have to do with the transition process?  It 
>> doesn't seem clear to me.  I think a change like this would have to go 
>> back for ccNSO and GNSO and SSAC approval.
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>> From: cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
>> [mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Tijani BEN 
>> JEMAA Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 2:09 PM To:
>> cwg-dt-stewardship at icann.org Cc: 'Olivier Crépin-Leblond'; 'ICANN 
>> At-Large Staff' Subject: Re: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] Update from the ALAC 
>> on the charter adoption
>>
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>>
>>
>> This is to inform you that the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) 
>> adopted the proposed charter with the friendly amendment attached.
>> ALAC also supports the SSAC proposed Amendment.
>>
>> However, should it be too late to make changes, the ALAC accepts the 
>> version as proposed by the Drafting Team and endorse it as is.
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----------
>>
>>
>>
> Tijani BEN JEMAA
>> Executive Director Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations
>> (FMAI) Phone:  + 216 41 649 605 Mobile: + 216 98 330 114 Fax:
>> + 216 70 853 376
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----------
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> [http://static.avast.com/emails/avast-mail-stamp.png]<http://www.avast
>> .com/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel 
>> malveillant parce que la protection Antivirus 
>> avast!<http://www.avast.com/> est active.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________ CWG-DT-Stewardship 
>> mailing list CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org 
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-dt-stewardship
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-DT-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-dt-stewardship
> 
>