[CWG-DT-Stewardship] Update from the ALAC on the charter adoption

[Marika Konings]

Avri, 

If I understand it correctly, the ALAC has adopted the same charter as the
ccNSO, GNSO and SSAC have, and in addition have put forward two proposed
amendments that have already received the support of the ALAC with a
request for the other groups to consider adopting these as well. As such,
it is my understanding that the CWG can start its operations under the
charter as adopted by all groups and can consider as one of its first
items whether or not it is necessary to go back to the ccNSO, GNSO and
SSAC to request consideration of the amendments as proposed by the ALAC.
Do others see it differently?

Best regards,

Marika 

On 12/09/14 17:26, "Avri Doria" <avri at acm.org> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>Certainly viability and effectiveness, for some definkition of such
>terms, of any new proposed solution is in scope, I would think.
>
>Well it is an NTIA requirement that this be a no charge service.    At
>the very least this will need to be stated as a continuing requirement,
>assuming it is.
>
>And part of the reason for NTIA actions is globalization.  Whether we
>decide to recommend any globalization solutions or not and what they
>entail, this too is something that we may want to discuss.
>
>I am not sure that we needed the amendment, but on seeing that these
>issues could be called out of scope by some, I guess it is worth the
>discussing.
>
>Since ALAC approved with an amendment the rest of us don't have,
>something has to change somewhere to bring the charters into 100%
>alignment.  either they have to drop it, or the rest have to accept it,
>if I understand the situation correctly.
>
>avri
>
>On 12-Sep-14 08:28, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>> I am having trouble seeing what they have to do with NTIA's role going
>>away so I am just trying to understand that.
>> 
>> Chuck
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
>>[mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
>> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 10:48 PM
>> To: cwg-dt-stewardship at icann.org
>> Subject: Re: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] Update from the ALAC on the charter
>>adoption
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> why isn't it in scope.
>> 
>>> Issues related to ensuring IANA's viabbility (sic) and effectiveness,
>>> are also within the scope of the CWG. Such issues could include, but
>>> are not limited to: Charging structure or the lack thereof and
>>> languages that IANA can function in.
>> 
>> 
>> I would think that stability of the transition requires that such
>>issues be in scope. In fact why wouldn't any issue having to do with
>>IANA futures be in scope?
>> 
>> I am not sure we need the amendment, but I certainly don't see it as
>>out of scope.
>> 
>> avri
>> 
>> 
>> On 11-Sep-14 17:13, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>>> Tijani,
>>>
>>> What does this addition have to do with the transition process?  It
>>> doesn't seem clear to me.  I think a change like this would have to go
>>> back for ccNSO and GNSO and SSAC approval.
>>>
>>> Chuck
>>>
>>> From: cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
>>> [mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Tijani BEN
>>> JEMAA Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 2:09 PM To:
>>> cwg-dt-stewardship at icann.org Cc: 'Olivier Crépin-Leblond'; 'ICANN
>>> At-Large Staff' Subject: Re: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] Update from the ALAC
>>> on the charter adoption
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This is to inform you that the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC)
>>> adopted the proposed charter with the friendly amendment attached.
>>> ALAC also supports the SSAC proposed Amendment.
>>>
>>> However, should it be too late to make changes, the ALAC accepts the
>>> version as proposed by the Drafting Team and endorse it as is.
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ----------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Tijani BEN JEMAA
>>> Executive Director Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations
>>> (FMAI) Phone:  + 216 41 649 605 Mobile: + 216 98 330 114 Fax:
>>> + 216 70 853 376
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ----------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> [http://static.avast.com/emails/avast-mail-stamp.png]<http://www.avast
>>> .com/>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel
>>> malveillant parce que la protection Antivirus
>>> avast!<http://www.avast.com/> est active.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________ CWG-DT-Stewardship
>>> mailing list CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-dt-stewardship
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CWG-DT-Stewardship mailing list
>> CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-dt-stewardship
>> 
>> 
>_______________________________________________
>CWG-DT-Stewardship mailing list
>CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-dt-stewardship
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5056 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-dt-stewardship/attachments/20140912/1c6e55cc/smime-0001.p7s>