<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=iso-8859-1"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">Tijani,<div><br></div><div>Your point is a valid one and well made. In general, I do agree with you. Having said that, I have a suspicion that, in this specific case, a little wordsmithing now may well avert objections and criticism of wording which may delay the approval of this document downstream.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers, Julie</div><div><br><div><div>On 15 Aug 2014, at 8:29 am, Tijani BEN JEMAA <<a href="mailto:tijani.benjemaa@planet.tn">tijani.benjemaa@planet.tn</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div><div lang="FR" link="blue" vlink="purple" style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><div class="Section1" style="page: Section1;"><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(54, 95, 145);">Why it is crucial to have the same wording as the ICG one???<o:p></o:p></span></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(54, 95, 145);">We agreed on a charter after several iterations of drafting and update. We fixed a deadline for last last update, and this deadline is passed. The final document had the full consensus of the drafting team. There is no reason we modify it.<o:p></o:p></span></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(54, 95, 145);">If we continue like that, we will never finish modifying our charter.<o:p></o:p></span></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(54, 95, 145);"> </span></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(54, 95, 145);">So, my inclination is to keep the already agreed text without modification.<o:p></o:p></span></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(54, 95, 145);"> </span></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(54, 95, 145);">Tijani<o:p></o:p></span></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(54, 95, 145);"> </span></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(54, 95, 145);"> </span></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(54, 95, 145);"> </span></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(54, 95, 145);"> </span></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><span lang="EN-US">-----Message d'origine-----<br>De : <a href="mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces@icann.org">cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a> [<a href="mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces@icann.org">mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a>] De l</span>a part de Byron Holland<br>Envoyé : jeudi 14 août 2014 17:15<br>À : Julie Hammer; Avri Doria<br>Cc : <a href="mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship@icann.org">cwg-dt-stewardship@icann.org</a><br>Objet : Re: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] Final Draft Charter</div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><o:p> </o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">I was about to hit 'send' to circulate the draft charter to my council. But seeing these comments, and being in agreement with them, I have taken the liberty of replacing our paragraph under 'Relationship to ICANN Accountability Review Process' with the words used by the ICG. I have attached both a 'track changes' version and a 'clean' version. <o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><o:p> </o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">But now I must really send this out to my council.<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><o:p> </o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">Byron<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><o:p> </o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">-----Original Message-----<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">From: <a href="mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces@icann.org">cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a> [<a href="mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces@icann.org">mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a>] On Behalf Of Julie Hammer<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">Sent: August-14-14 10:31 AM<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">To: Avri Doria<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">Cc: <a href="mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship@icann.org">cwg-dt-stewardship@icann.org</a><o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">Subject: Re: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] Final Draft Charter<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><o:p> </o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">Hi Avri,<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><o:p> </o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">Thanks for the feedback and sorry to hear you've been getting a hard time.<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><o:p> </o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">Re Milton's comments about our wording, I agree that the ICG Charter is essentially saying the same thing that we are, but probably more eloquently. If there is strong feeling about our language, I would not object to using the same (probably better language) as the ICG in our CWG charter.<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><o:p> </o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">Cheers, Julie<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><o:p> </o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">On 14 Aug 2014, at 11:54 pm, Avri Doria <<a href="mailto:avri@acm.org">avri@acm.org</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><o:p> </o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><o:p> </o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><o:p> </o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">On 13-Aug-14 10:46, Allan MacGillivray wrote:<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> Milton Mueller has even characterized it as being 'impressive'<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> <<a href="http://www.internetgovernance.org/">http://www.internetgovernance.org/</a>>. Congratulations to everyone who<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> worked on it.<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><o:p> </o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><o:p> </o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">Perhaps, but he is slamming me for it now. Indicating that we missed a chance to link the CWG to the Transparency work.<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><o:p> </o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> I am wondering why this statement on accountability seems to assume<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> that there is "no linkage" between ICANN accountability and IANA<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> accountability, when, in fact, there is.<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">><o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> "Any linkages between the work of the CWG on the IANA transition and<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> the broader ICANN Accountability Review Process with regard to ICANN<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> policy are outside the scope of this group's work. Accountability for<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> the administration of the IANA functions (i.e., implementation and<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> operational accountability), however, is properly within the scope of<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> this working group."<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">><o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> The ICG charter handled this relationship in a much better way:<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">><o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> " The IANA stewardship transition process is taking place alongside a<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> parallel and related process on enhancing ICANN accountability.<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> While maintaining the accountability of Internet identifier governance<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> is central to both processes, this group's scope is focused on the<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> arrangements required for the continuance of IANA functions in an<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> accountable and widely accepted manner after the expiry of the<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> NTIA-ICANN contract. Nevertheless, the two processes are interrelated<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> and interdependent and should appropriately coordinate their work."<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><o:p> </o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><o:p> </o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">I have argued:<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><o:p> </o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">><o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> I think they both say a similar thing.<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">><o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> - the greater ICANN accountability is seperate - accountability<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> related to IANA is in scope<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><o:p> </o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">and<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">><o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> On 13-Aug-14 17:32, Dan Krimm wrote:<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><o:p> </o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">>> So, if one accepts as true the notion that each jurisdiction's<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">>> results will affect the other jurisdiction significantly, then even<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">>> if the specific working groups have narrow scope of authority and<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">>> jurisdiction, they still ought to be talking to each other along the<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">>> way, perhaps cross-pollinating each other with ideas and monitoring<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">>> each others' progress.<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">><o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">><o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> I do. I think that making IANA accountability part of the CWG's work<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> it accepts the challenge of coordinating them. And maybe even going<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> further than passive coordination.<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">><o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> Another point, is that IANA accountability is what counts in this<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> case, and while unlikely that some entity other than ICANN will end up<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> ultimately responsible for IANA, the accountability requirements for<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> that function stand separate and should apply to whatever entity ends<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> up responsible, next year or in 10 years. As such this group could<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> come up with requirements that do not immediately fall inside whatever<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> it is we end up doing about ICANN accountability - remember the note<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> we just sent about the ICANN accountability processes seeming rigged.<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">><o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> This is a good topic for discussion, and should be brought up in the<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> GNSO council discussions by our council members (myself included) if<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> we continue to find it problematic.<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><o:p> </o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><o:p> </o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">and repsonse from Milton<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><o:p> </o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> The statement of the ICG is even stronger than Dan suggests. We said:<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">><o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">><o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> "the two processes are interrelated and interdependent and should<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> appropriately coordinate their work."<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">><o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> This is not just "talking to each other" and "cross pollinating, it<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> suggests that they are interdependent and thus should coordinate. An<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> extreme example of such interdependency and coordination would be to<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> not complete the transition until certain commitments are made on the<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> broader accountability process. I am afraid the CWG charter sets up<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> the false notion that the two things are completely detached and<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> separate processes, which is exactly what ICANN wants and exactly what<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> advocates of accountability don't want.<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">><o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> I don't understand why Avri is not seeing this and offering apologias<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">> for the oversight in the CWG charter.<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><o:p> </o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><o:p> </o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">cheers,<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><o:p> </o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">avri<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">CWG-DT-Stewardship mailing list<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><a href="mailto:CWG-DT-Stewardship@icann.org">CWG-DT-Stewardship@icann.org</a><o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-dt-stewardship">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-dt-stewardship</a><o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><o:p> </o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;">CWG-DT-Stewardship mailing list<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><a href="mailto:CWG-DT-Stewardship@icann.org">CWG-DT-Stewardship@icann.org</a><o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Consolas;"><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-dt-stewardship">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-dt-stewardship</a><o:p></o:p></div></div><br><br><hr style="border: none; color: rgb(144, 144, 144); background-color: rgb(176, 176, 176); height: 1px; width: 1180px;"><table style="border-collapse: collapse; border: none;"><tbody><tr><td style="border: none; padding: 0px 15px 0px 8px;"><a href="http://www.avast.com/" style="color: purple; text-decoration: underline;"><img border="0" src="http://static.avast.com/emails/avast-mail-stamp.png"></a></td><td><p style="color: rgb(61, 77, 90); font-family: Calibri, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica; font-size: 12pt;">Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant parce que la protection<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="http://www.avast.com/" style="color: purple; text-decoration: underline;">Antivirus avast!</a><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>est active.</p></td></tr></tbody></table></div></div></div><br></div></body></html>