<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoPlainText, li.MsoPlainText, div.MsoPlainText
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Plain Text Char";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.5pt;
font-family:Consolas;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0cm;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0cm;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:8.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
span.PlainTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Plain Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Plain Text";
font-family:Consolas;}
p.Textebrut, li.Textebrut, div.Textebrut
{mso-style-name:"Texte brut";
mso-style-link:"Texte brut Car";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
span.TextebrutCar
{mso-style-name:"Texte brut Car";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Texte brut";
font-family:Consolas;}
span.BalloonTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
span.EmailStyle24
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-CA" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Tijani – this is the version that was approved by the ccNSO Council.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Regards<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Allan<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces@icann.org]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Tijani BEN JEMAA<br>
<b>Sent:</b> August-22-14 4:16 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Byron Holland; 'Marika Konings'; 'Julie Hammer'; 'Avri Doria'<br>
<b>Cc:</b> cwg-dt-stewardship@icann.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] Final Draft Charter<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#365F91">Good morning Byron,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#365F91"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#365F91">My understanding is that the chair(s) of the drafting team will make a call for approval to all chartering organizations. I already circulated
the latest version to the ALAC list asking for comments. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#365F91">Also, you are referring to the version circulated by Marika, but there were several versions circulated by Marika. Now that you are asking for
the chartering organizations approval, it is better to attach the version you want them to approve to avoid any confusion.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#365F91"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#365F91">So, I’m ready to call for the approval of ALAC if you prefer this way of working. But I need you to send the version approved by the ccNSO.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="FR"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#17365D">--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#17365D">Tijani BEN JEMAA<o:p></o:p></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#17365D">Executive Director<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#17365D">Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations
</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;color:#17365D">(<b>FMAI</b>)</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:13.0pt;color:#17365D"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="FR" style="color:#17365D">Phone: + 216 41 649 605<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="FR" style="color:#17365D">Mobile: + 216 98 330 114<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="FR" style="color:#17365D">Fax: + 216 70 853 376<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#17365D">--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#1F497D"> </span><span lang="FR" style="color:#1F497D"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="FR"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#365F91"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">-----Message d'origine-----<br>
De : <a href="mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces@icann.org">cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a> [<a href="mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces@icann.org">mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a>] De la part de Byron Holland<br>
Envoyé : jeudi 21 août 2014 22:26<br>
À : Marika Konings; Julie Hammer; Avri Doria<br>
Cc : <a href="mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship@icann.org">cwg-dt-stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
Objet : Re: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] Final Draft Charter<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">Dear All - I just want to follow-up on the status of the charter. Though I agree to reinserting the words "Accountability for the administration of the IANA functions (i.e., implementation and operational accountability),
however, is properly within the scope of this working group" into the draft, I had already circulated the version without these to my council. However, I am pleased to report that at our meeting this morning the ccNSO Council approved the charter and that
these words were discussed and reinserted at that time. So the version that Marika circulated on Monday is that which was approved by the ccNSO Council. Could I ask the other SO/AC representatives send this version to their chairs with the news that it has
been approved by the ccNSO Council. I will undertake to send it to Heather Dryden, as chair of the GAC. I would appreciate being kept informed of the status of the approval process in these other groups. I also undertake to send it to representativ<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR"> es of the Internet protocols and addressing communities so that they might understand where we stand.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">Finally, let we add my thanks and congratulations to the drafting team for your hard work in producing such a quality document in such a short period of time.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">Byron<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">-----Original Message-----<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText">From: Marika Konings [<span lang="FR"><a href="mailto:marika.konings@icann.org"><span lang="EN-CA">mailto:marika.konings@icann.org</span></a></span>]
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">Sent: August-18-14 11:27 AM<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">To: Byron Holland; Julie Hammer; Avri Doria<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">Cc: <a href="mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship@icann.org">
cwg-dt-stewardship@icann.org</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">Subject: Re: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] Final Draft Charter<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">Dear All,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">Based on the comments on the mailing list as well as initial feedback from<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">the GNSO Council list, there is support for adding back in the sentence<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">that was deleted in section II last paragraph of the scope section as<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">pointed out by Chuck, namely: ""Accountability for the administration of<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">the IANA functions (i.e., implementation and operational accountability),<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">however, is properly within the scope of this working group." For your<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">convenience, please find attached a revised version of the charter that<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">includes this sentence for distribution to your groups. Should any<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">additional comments come in from your respective groups, you may want to<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">relay these to the DT so it can be determined whether further changes are<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">needed / desirable, noting that the further along the consideration of the<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">charter by the different groups goes, the more time it may take to pull<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">back the charter and incorporate possible changes to make sure all groups<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">adopt the same version. As in this case it concerns a sentence that was<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">probably inadvertantly deleted, hopefully it will not cause any major<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">issues.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">Best regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">Marika<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText">On 14/08/14 18:15, "Byron Holland" <<span lang="FR"><a href="mailto:byron.holland@cira.ca"><span lang="EN-CA">byron.holland@cira.ca</span></a></span>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>I was about to hit 'send' to circulate the draft charter to my council.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>But seeing these comments, and being in agreement with them, I have taken<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>the liberty of replacing our paragraph under 'Relationship to ICANN<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>Accountability Review Process' with the words used by the ICG. I have<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>attached both a 'track changes' version and a 'clean' version.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>But now I must really send this out to my council.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>Byron<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>-----Original Message-----<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText">>From: <span lang="FR"><a href="mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces@icann.org"><span lang="EN-CA">cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</span></a></span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText">>[<span lang="FR"><a href="mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces@icann.org"><span lang="EN-CA">mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</span></a></span>] On Behalf Of Julie Hammer<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>Sent: August-14-14 10:31 AM<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>To: Avri Doria<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>Cc: <a href="mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship@icann.org">
cwg-dt-stewardship@icann.org</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>Subject: Re: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] Final Draft Charter<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>Hi Avri,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>Thanks for the feedback and sorry to hear you've been getting a hard time.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>Re Milton's comments about our wording, I agree that the ICG Charter is<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>essentially saying the same thing that we are, but probably more<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>eloquently. If there is strong feeling about our language, I would not<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>object to using the same (probably better language) as the ICG in our CWG<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>charter.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>Cheers, Julie<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText">>On 14 Aug 2014, at 11:54 pm, Avri Doria <<span lang="FR"><a href="mailto:avri@acm.org"><span lang="EN-CA">avri@acm.org</span></a></span>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>On 13-Aug-14 10:46, Allan MacGillivray wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> Milton Mueller has even characterized it as being 'impressive'<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> <<a href="http://www.internetgovernance.org/">http://www.internetgovernance.org/</a>>. Congratulations to everyone who<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> worked on it.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>Perhaps, but he is slamming me for it now. Indicating that we missed a<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>chance to link the CWG to the Transparency work.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> I am wondering why this statement on accountability seems to assume<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> that there is "no linkage" between ICANN accountability and IANA<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> accountability, when, in fact, there is.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> "Any linkages between the work of the CWG on the IANA transition and<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> the broader ICANN Accountability Review Process with regard to ICANN<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> policy are outside the scope of this group's work. Accountability for<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> the administration of the IANA functions (i.e., implementation and<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> operational accountability), however, is properly within the scope of<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> this working group."<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> The ICG charter handled this relationship in a much better way:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> " The IANA stewardship transition process is taking place alongside a<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> parallel and related process on enhancing ICANN accountability.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> While maintaining the accountability of Internet identifier governance<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> is central to both processes, this group's scope is focused on the<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> arrangements required for the continuance of IANA functions in an<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> accountable and widely accepted manner after the expiry of the<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> NTIA-ICANN contract. Nevertheless, the two processes are interrelated<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> and interdependent and should appropriately coordinate their work."<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>I have argued:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> I think they both say a similar thing.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> - the greater ICANN accountability is seperate - accountability<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> related to IANA is in scope<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>and<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> On 13-Aug-14 17:32, Dan Krimm wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>>> So, if one accepts as true the notion that each jurisdiction's<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>>> results will affect the other jurisdiction significantly, then even<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>>> if the specific working groups have narrow scope of authority and<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>>> jurisdiction, they still ought to be talking to each other along the<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>>> way, perhaps cross-pollinating each other with ideas and monitoring<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>>> each others' progress.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> I do. I think that making IANA accountability part of the CWG's work<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> it accepts the challenge of coordinating them. And maybe even going<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> further than passive coordination.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> Another point, is that IANA accountability is what counts in this<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> case, and while unlikely that some entity other than ICANN will end up<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> ultimately responsible for IANA, the accountability requirements for<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> that function stand separate and should apply to whatever entity ends<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> up responsible, next year or in 10 years. As such this group could<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> come up with requirements that do not immediately fall inside whatever<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> it is we end up doing about ICANN accountability - remember the note<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> we just sent about the ICANN accountability processes seeming rigged.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> This is a good topic for discussion, and should be brought up in the<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> GNSO council discussions by our council members (myself included) if<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> we continue to find it problematic.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>and repsonse from Milton<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> The statement of the ICG is even stronger than Dan suggests. We said:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> "the two processes are interrelated and interdependent and should<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> appropriately coordinate their work."<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> This is not just "talking to each other" and "cross pollinating, it<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> suggests that they are interdependent and thus should coordinate. An<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> extreme example of such interdependency and coordination would be to<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> not complete the transition until certain commitments are made on the<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> broader accountability process. I am afraid the CWG charter sets up<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> the false notion that the two things are completely detached and<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> separate processes, which is exactly what ICANN wants and exactly what<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> advocates of accountability don't want.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> I don't understand why Avri is not seeing this and offering apologias<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>> for the oversight in the CWG charter.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>cheers,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>avri<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>CWG-DT-Stewardship mailing list<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">><a href="mailto:CWG-DT-Stewardship@icann.org">CWG-DT-Stewardship@icann.org</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-dt-stewardship">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-dt-stewardship</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">>CWG-DT-Stewardship mailing list<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">><a href="mailto:CWG-DT-Stewardship@icann.org">CWG-DT-Stewardship@icann.org</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-dt-stewardship">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-dt-stewardship</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR">CWG-DT-Stewardship mailing list<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR"><a href="mailto:CWG-DT-Stewardship@icann.org">CWG-DT-Stewardship@icann.org</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="FR"><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-dt-stewardship">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-dt-stewardship</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span lang="FR" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><span lang="FR" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">
<hr size="1" width="99%" noshade="" style="color:#909090" align="center">
</span></div>
<table class="MsoNormalTable" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" style="border-collapse:collapse">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="padding:0cm 11.25pt 0cm 6.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif""><a href="http://www.avast.com/"><span style="text-decoration:none"><img border="0" id="_x0000_i1026" src="http://static.avast.com/emails/avast-mail-stamp.png"></span></a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding:.75pt .75pt .75pt .75pt">
<p><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#3D4D5A">Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant parce que la protection
<a href="http://www.avast.com/">Antivirus avast!</a> est active. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="FR" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>