[DT-F] DT-F Recommendations - v04

[Milton L Mueller]

Alan, Chuck, DTF members
I've made my own set of edits. Many of them are improvements in wording or document flow but there are some that might be viewed as substantive. In some cases I have made some comments. 

One of the key comments concerns the principle of not combining the IANA and RZM in the same entity. I have been asking several times for an articulate of why we think this is important. It is still not in the report. I think our description of why this is important would directly bear on what form the separation took. Therefore it is essential to provide more articulate of what we think we are trying to do. 

Interesting, while reviewing the Verisign CA amendments from 1998 it is clear that NTIA/USG at that time planned to combine those functions into what it called "NewCo." 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cwg-dtf-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-dtf-bounces at icann.org] On
> Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 9:57 AM
> To: Alan Greenberg; CWG DT-F
> Subject: Re: [DT-F] DT-F Recommendations - v04
> 
> Nice job Alan.  I proposed some edits and inserted a few comments that are
> highlighted in the attached file.
> 
> Chuck
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cwg-dtf-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-dtf-bounces at icann.org] On
> Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 12:37 AM
> To: CWG DT-F
> Subject: [DT-F] DT-F Recommendations - v04
> 
> Please find attached the revised set of recommendations.
> 
> There is still work to be done. In particular, the short form and long-form
> recommendations need to be made a bit more consistent with each other,
> and the short form still needs to be tightened up a bit.
> Note that two of the Principles were not included in the short form.
> 
> Please focus on whether the content says what we want it to.
> 
> I will try to get out a revised version just prior to the CWG meeting at 17:00
> UTC.
> 
> Alan