[DT-F] Meeting and draft proposal

Suzanne Woolf suzworldwide at gmail.com
Tue May 19 11:43:21 UTC 2015


Alan,

I have a last-minute conflict and will be unable to join this call. My apologies.

On May 18, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:

> A reminder that we have our meeting tomorrow at 12:00 UTC. The draft proposal below has been modified to include the RZ Maintainer rep which I had accidentally omitted.
> 
> Alan
> 
> At 12/05/2015 12:45 PM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
>> I have requested that a Doodle be sent out for a 90 minute meeting either late this week or early next week.
>> 
>> Here is a very rough draft proposal. At some point in discussions (perhaps in the CWG as a whole), it was suggested that the ICANN Board could be the authorization body, and I have taken that as as good a proposal as any, and tried to flesh it out.
>> 
>> Alan
>> =================
>> 
>> Draft Proposal to replace NTIA Administrative Oversight
>> 
>> Currently the NTIA is involved in virtually all changes to the architecture and implementation of the Root Zone (excluding those solely within individual Root Servers?) and all operational and procedural changes within IANA and the Root Zone Maintainer.
>> 
>> DT-F has recommended that such oversight is no longer required for day-to-day changes, but that oversight is still required for substantive changes.
>> 
>> Recommendation:
>> 
>> 1.      Final approval over such changes will be given by the ICANN Board.
>> 
>> 2.      Recommendations for such approval will be given by a new Board committee which shall be composed of:
>> 
>>         a.       One Board member, preferably with significant knowledge of the DNS as Chair
>>         b.       The senior IANA administrator or her/his delegate
>>         c.       The Chairs or their delegates of the SSAC, RSSAC and the IETF (IAB?)
>>         d.       A representative of a gTLD operator (named by?)
>>         e.       A representative of a ccTLD operator (named by?)
>>         f.       A representative of the RZ Maintainer
>>         g.       ??
>> 
>> 3.      The above committee will involve other experts as dictated by the subject matter at hand.
>> 
>> 4.      For major architectural changes, there should be wide public consultation
>> 
>> 5.      Changes to the approval structure shall be deemed to be a substantive change and will require committee approval.
>> 
>> 6.      To the extent allowed based the need for security and contractually required confidentiality, the proceedings of the committee should be open and transparent.
>> _______________________________________________
>> cwg-dtf mailing list
>> cwg-dtf at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-dtf
> _______________________________________________
> cwg-dtf mailing list
> cwg-dtf at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-dtf

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-dtf/attachments/20150519/1593df5e/attachment.html>


More information about the cwg-dtf mailing list