[Cwg-framework-principles] Updated Public Comment Review Tool following the meeting of 10 May

Fri May 13 13:36:29 UTC 2016

Thanks for the summary.  Looks good to me.

Jim

On 13 May 2016, at 5:55, Mary Wong wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> Please find attached, in “redlined” format, an updated tabular 
> summary of the public comments received to our Draft Framework. The 
> updates reflect the staff understanding of the discussion that took 
> place on the working group call earlier this week, on 10 May.
>
> The next call will be held on 24 May at 1800 UTC. Staff expects that 
> Becky and John, our co-chairs, will provide an update on discussions 
> they are planning to have with interested Board Members at the Global 
> Domains Division (GDD) Summit next week, and a continuation of our 
> review of the remaining public comments.
>
> Please note that an open cross-community session on our Framework has 
> been scheduled for the ICANN56 meeting in Helsinki, on Wednesday 29 
> June at 1800 Helsinki time. Our hope is that by that time we will be 
> in a position to produce an updated, proposed Final Framework based on 
> our analysis of the public comments, which can be presented to the 
> community at that session for feedback and discussion.
>
> Thanks and cheers
> Mary
>
>
> Mary Wong
> Senior Policy Director
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
> Email: mary.wong at icann.org
> Telephone: +1-603-5744889
>
>
> From: Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org<mailto:mary.wong at icann.org>>
> Date: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 at 16:07
> To: 
> "cwg-framework-principles at icann.org<mailto:cwg-framework-principles at icann.org>" 
> <cwg-framework-principles at icann.org<mailto:cwg-framework-principles at icann.org>>
> Subject: Re: Report of public comments for review at our upcoming 
> meeting
>
> Dear all,
>
> Further to the message below, and again in preparation for our meeting 
> coming up in a few hours, I’m pleased to confirm that the staff 
> report of public comments has now been published on the ICANN website, 
> thereby closing the public forum for our Draft Framework: 
> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ccwg-framework-principles-draft-2016-02-22-en#summary.
>
> We hope that the report as well as the tabular Public Comment Review 
> Tool circulated a few days ago will be helpful to you as you review 
> the public comments we received with a view toward updating and/or 
> amending our draft document, as appropriate.
>
> Thanks and cheers
> Mary
>
>
> Mary Wong
> Senior Policy Director
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
> Email: mary.wong at icann.org<mailto:mary.wong at icann.org>
> Telephone: +1-603-5744889
>
>
> From: Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org<mailto:mary.wong at icann.org>>
> Date: Saturday, May 7, 2016 at 02:54
> To: 
> "cwg-framework-principles at icann.org<mailto:cwg-framework-principles at icann.org>" 
> <cwg-framework-principles at icann.org<mailto:cwg-framework-principles at icann.org>>
> Subject: Report of public comments for review at our upcoming meeting
>
> Dear all,
>
> To facilitate the group’s discussion at our upcoming meeting on 
> Tuesday 10 May at 1800 UTC, and to aid your review of all the public 
> comments that we received in response to our publication of the Draft 
> Framework of Principles for Future CCWGs, staff has prepared the 
> attached Public Comment Review Tool. This document is a tabular 
> summary, excerpting the most relevant parts of each comment submitted 
> corresponding to the specific Section and Open Question from our Draft 
> Framework.
>
> In total, 15 relevant submissions were received from individuals as 
> well as groups. Most of the individual commenters drew from their 
> experiences in a number of CCWGs (including the CCWG-Accountability), 
> and the group submissions included comments from the ALAC, the 
> GNSO’s Registries Stakeholder Group and Intellectual Property 
> Constituency, the International Chamber of Commerce, the Government of 
> France and the ICANN Board.
>
> Please note that the Public Comment Review Tool does not replace your 
> review of each of the comments received, as the full nuances of all 
> the commenters’ concerns may need to be viewed in their full 
> context. In this regard, allow me to take the liberty of noting, in 
> particular, that more specific details were provided in the comments 
> of the Government of France and the ICANN Board as well as some 
> individual commenters (such as Mathieu Weill, co-chair of the 
> CCWG-Accountability) that could fairly be excerpted and summarized in 
> the Tool.  For that reason, you should refer to the full set of 
> comments at 
> https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-ccwg-framework-principles-22feb16/.
>
> The staff report of public comments received has been submitted for 
> publication as well.
>
> All the relevant documents can also be viewed and downloaded from our 
> group’s collaborative wiki space: see 
> https://community.icann.org/x/SwSOAw for a copy of the Public Comment 
> Review Tool and the staff report of public comments, and 
> https://community.icann.org/x/zASOAw for a copy of the Draft Framework 
> of Principles as published in February.
>
> Thanks and cheers
> Mary
>
>
>
>
> Mary Wong
> Senior Policy Director
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
> Email: mary.wong at icann.org<mailto:mary.wong at icann.org>
> Telephone: +1-603-5744889
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cwg-framework-principles mailing list
> Cwg-framework-principles at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-framework-principles