[Cwg-rfp1-2a-2b] FW: RFP-1 update

Fri Oct 31 15:11:50 UTC 2014

Will do.  I need to figure out where to insert it.

Chuck

From: Bernard Turcotte [mailto:turcotte.bernard at gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 10:44 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: Seun Ojedeji; Allan MacGillivray; CWG-RFP-1-2AB (cwg-rfp1-2a-2b at icann.org)
Subject: Re: [Cwg-rfp1-2a-2b] FW: RFP-1 update

Yes I think that is required.

B.

On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com<mailto:cgomes at verisign.com>> wrote:
Maybe I should simply raise a flag about this in what we submit to the full CWG list.

Chuck

From: Seun Ojedeji [mailto:seun.ojedeji at gmail.com<mailto:seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 1:25 AM
To: Allan MacGillivray
Cc: CWG-RFP-1-2AB (cwg-rfp1-2a-2b at icann.org<mailto:cwg-rfp1-2a-2b at icann.org>); Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond; Gomes, Chuck
Subject: Re: [Cwg-rfp1-2a-2b] FW: RFP-1 update

+1 and I observed that the IETF is indeed discussing it on their list. Nevertheless, it does not hurt to crosscheck with the Shepherd of the WG.

Cheers!

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 31 Oct 2014 01:47, "Allan MacGillivray" <allan.macgillivray at cira.ca<mailto:allan.macgillivray at cira.ca>> wrote:
Olivier – on .int I have flagged this in the triage (RFC 2C) suggesting that the GAC representatives might take consider how to treat it.  As to .ARPA, it does not fall within the remit of the ccNSO, nor of the GNSO as far as I know.  Someone should reach out to the IETF to see if they are dealing with it.

Allan

From: cwg-rfp1-2a-2b-bounces at icann.org<mailto:cwg-rfp1-2a-2b-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:cwg-rfp1-2a-2b-bounces at icann.org<mailto:cwg-rfp1-2a-2b-bounces at icann.org>] On Behalf Of Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
Sent: October-30-14 4:14 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; CWG-RFP-1-2AB (cwg-rfp1-2a-2b at icann.org<mailto:cwg-rfp1-2a-2b at icann.org>)
Subject: Re: [Cwg-rfp1-2a-2b] FW: RFP-1 update

Thanks for this Chuck et al.

Please find my comments/corrections attached for Section 1.

I note that nowhere are the management of .INT and .ARPA mentioned. Shouldn't it be also a task for the Names Community to look into this?

Kind regards,

Olivier
On 30/10/2014 11:32, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
Thank you very much Kieren for the huge amount of time you devoted to this.  It is extremely beneficial. I have not had time to review it yet but will do so shortly.  Please note that Bernie submitted the missing ccTLD sections for 2A separately and that  on 29 October I submitted a complete version of the Description of PDR Processes for gTLDs.  Those need to be added and edited as well.  If you would like me to add those to v.3.1, I will do that or you can add them yourself; please let me know if you would like me to do that.

For the sake of creating documents to the full CWG, I am going to divide the document into three separate files: Section 1 (with your intro); Section 2A; and Section 2B.  In doing so, I will use the edited text from version 3.1.  I plan to get that done today and will send the three versions to you and the full subgroup list.

All – to minimize version confusion with edits provided on separate versions, please wait until you receive the three separate versions before providing edits.

Chuck

From: Kieren McCarthy [mailto:kierenmccarthy at gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 1:14 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond; allan.macgillivray at cira.ca<mailto:allan.macgillivray at cira.ca>; Seun Ojedeji; Tracy F. Hackshaw @ Google; fouad Bajwa
Subject: Re: RFP-1 update

Hello all,

I have not completed this but attached is the latest version (up to page 12). I have called it version 3.1

I have been researching each one of the functions and providing links in footnotes as well as concise histories. This should immediately pay off with the other sections. In fact, we may end up repeating information so once we have 1, 2a and 2b together, we may want to revisit them as a whole and see if we can reduce it down.

It is taking longer than I expected - I've spent five hours on it today - but should be an excellent resource document once done.

Kieren

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com<mailto:cgomes at verisign.com>> wrote:
Allan asked me to send the attached draft for RFP-1 to all of the volunteers for this section of the RFP response.  Note that some editing is still going on as indicated on page 7.  Hopefully Kieren will provide additional editing later today.

I apologize for the lateness of this.  As I think you will understand once you see the work that has been done, this has been an extremely time consuming task.

Let me try to bring Olivier, Tracy and Fouad up to date in terms of what has been happening so far.  Allan with the help of Bernie has been focusing on the ccTLD side and I have been doing the same on the gTLD side.  First drafts were created for RFP 1 and  RFP 2A and are just about done for RFP 2B.  As you will see, all three sections are interrelated; that is why we have been working on them together.

I know that all of you did not volunteer for RFP-1, RFP-2A and RFP-2B, but I hope you are willing to help with all three because they are closely related.  Both Sections 2A and 2B refer to content from Section 1 and 2A and 2B are also related to one another.

Kieren and Seun who volunteered to work on these areas earlier last week have been providing feedback and asking questions.  Kieren has been applying his excellent writing skills to do major editing.  He did that for the first 7 or 8 pages of the attached draft for RFP Section 1 and hopefully will complete editing the rest of Section 1 today.

I have asked staff to create a mailing list for everyone who volunteered for RFP-1, RFP-2A and RFP- 2B.  They hope to do that by the end of the day to day.  In the meantime I hope I have included everyone.

I hope to be able to send a first version of Section 2A later today; it may not include edits from Seun and Kieren because of time constraints.  We hope to have a first version of Section 2B by tomorrow.

For now, until the combined email list is set up, please feel free to 'reply to all' on this message if you have any questions or comments.  To make it less confusing, let's wait until Kieren completes his thorough editing task of Section 1 before others add any edits.

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond [mailto:ocl at gih.com<mailto:ocl at gih.com>]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 12:58 PM
To: allan.macgillivray at cira.ca<mailto:allan.macgillivray at cira.ca>; Gomes, Chuck; kieren McCarthy; Seun Ojedeji; Tracy F. Hackshaw @ Google; fouad Bajwa
Subject: RFP-1 update
Dear all,

checking through RFP sub-groups, I haven't seen much movement on this
RFP-1 sub-group (at least, not on the main mailing list). Are discussions taking place directly by email or should we kick-start the discussion?
Kindest regards,

Olivier

_______________________________________________

Cwg-rfp1-2a-2b mailing list

Cwg-rfp1-2a-2b at icann.org<mailto:Cwg-rfp1-2a-2b at icann.org>

https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp1-2a-2b

--

Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD

http://www.gih.com/ocl.html

_______________________________________________
Cwg-rfp1-2a-2b mailing list
Cwg-rfp1-2a-2b at icann.org<mailto:Cwg-rfp1-2a-2b at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp1-2a-2b

_______________________________________________
Cwg-rfp1-2a-2b mailing list
Cwg-rfp1-2a-2b at icann.org<mailto:Cwg-rfp1-2a-2b at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp1-2a-2b

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-rfp1-2a-2b/attachments/20141031/1c86e2e2/attachment-0001.html>