[CWG-RFP3] Proposed Agenda for 6 November Call

[Greg Shatan]

Wale and All,

Grace will send around a calendar item for the Wednesday subgroup call.  It
has not been sent yet, but I expect it will be sent shortly.

Greg

On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Olawale Bakare <wales.baky at googlemail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Greg,
>
> Thank you for the updates. The Wednesday call should be suitable for me as
> i know, there is no foreseeable thing preventing my participation.  I
> wouldn't know whether i might have missed email sent with a Google calendar
> organized for the Wednesday call. Is there a calendar setup for the call as
> a reminder?
>
> Regards,
> Wale
>
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Wale,
>>
>> Given the short amount of time we have to do our work, I hope that as
>> many people can attend the Wednesday call as possible.  Participation on
>> the email list is also important, especially for those who cannot be on the
>> call.  Since we have the full CWG call on Thursday, and Tuesday is a
>> holiday in much of Europe (and to a lesser extent, in North America), and
>> Monday is too close to get things done in between RFP3 calls, Wednesday
>> seemed like the best alternative.  The time is one that seems to work
>> tolerably well for most (the US West Coast is a little early, but most
>> people are at least awake at that hour).
>>
>> Greg
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Olawale Bakare <
>> wales.baky at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Why i would support that simply to get foothold as well concretize the
>>> areas highlighted in today's call - Oversight council and ccTLD and gTLD
>>> sub-groups formation. However, how would it fit in without clash with
>>> caller's schedules prior to the next F2F meeting in Frankfurt?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Wale
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Dear Greg,
>>>>
>>>> it appears that you did not hear me at the end of the call. I was going
>>>> to suggest we have another RFP-3 call next week, prior to the F2F in
>>>> Frankfurt.
>>>>
>>>> The reason for my concern is that we really need to get the simple
>>>> stuff out of the way before we meet F2F. For example, I would really like
>>>> to avoid that we discuss process, especially our own internal process. So I
>>>> would feel a lot happier if we could have, even a short call next week,
>>>> where we set out exactly how we are going to use our F2F time as well as
>>>> possible.
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>
>>>> Olivier
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 05/11/2014 23:16, Grace Abuhamad wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Dear all,
>>>>
>>>>  *Please read and familiarize yourself with the two attached
>>>> background documents in anticipation of the RFP3 subgroup call.*
>>>>
>>>>  Below is the proposed agenda:
>>>>
>>>>    1. Welcome & Roll Call
>>>>    2. Coordination Team for RFP3 subgroup
>>>>    3. Timeline & Deliverables
>>>>    4. Review of Variables document and CWG RFP 2A document
>>>>    5. AOB
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Best,
>>>>  Grace
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Cwg-rfp3 mailing listCwg-rfp3 at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp3
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhDhttp://www.gih.com/ocl.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Cwg-rfp3 mailing list
>>>> Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org
>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp3
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-rfp3/attachments/20141107/091bd073/attachment.html>