[CWG-RFP3] Proposed Agenda for Wednesday 12 November Meeting
Robert Guerra
rguerra at privaterra.org
Wed Nov 12 16:52:36 UTC 2014
Great!
Looking forward to the discussion on the elements that might be best to
select from the different proposals.
Robert
On 2014-11-12 11:43 AM, Greg Shatan wrote:
> Robert,
>
> If I may interject, I think that is largely what is contemplated in
> Strawmen 2 and 3. As indicated on the call, the proposals are very much
> "mix and match." So, matching an independent entity (PROC or PROSI in
> the Strawman) with a separable-but-not-separate IANA (as in Strawman 1)
> and a contract that can be re-bid periodically and that has
> termination-for-breach provisions (as in Strawmen 2 and 3) is very much
> in scope.
>
> Greg
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Robert Guerra <rguerra at privaterra.org
> <mailto:rguerra at privaterra.org>> wrote:
>
> Milton,
>
> Your comments and those of Avri on the call earlier this morning have
> made me think of another possible way forward, what not sure if is in
> scope so let me know..
>
> That being, changing object of what needs changing. Instead of focusing
> on IANA as we have, it might worthwhile to also think about options that
> could replace NTIA.
>
> A new independent entity take on the authorization step(s) that NTIA now
> performs, review service level agreements, and subject to regular review
> (5, 10 years?) assign the IANA contract.
>
> Before going further, do let me know if you think it would be in scope
> or not.
>
> regards
>
> Robert
>
>
>
> On 2014-11-12 10:47 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
> > Greg
> >
> > I see a fundamental problem with your options, hinging in the concept of
> > separability. The point of separability is not to make IANA itself
> > separate from ICANN per se, but to allow the new contracting authority
> > to open bidding to other possible IANA functions operators. In other
> > words, the IANA contract should be periodic, as it was under NTIA, and
> > potentially competitive - the contracting authority should be able to
> > receive multiple applications for the function and decide which one is
> > best.
> >
> >
> >
> > In all of your models, I don’t see that happening – instead I see an
> > emphasis on the separability of IANA from ICANN organizationally, but no
> > concept of periodic renewal and open, competitive bidding.
> >
> >
> >
> > Am I missing something, or are you?
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:*cwg-rfp3-bounces at icann.org
> <mailto:cwg-rfp3-bounces at icann.org>
> [mailto:cwg-rfp3-bounces at icann.org <mailto:cwg-rfp3-bounces at icann.org>]
> > *On Behalf Of *Greg Shatan
> > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 11, 2014 10:28 PM
> > *To:* Grace Abuhamad
> > *Cc:* RFP3
> > *Subject:* Re: [CWG-RFP3] Proposed Agenda for Wednesday 12
> November Meeting
> >
> >
> >
> > All:
> >
> >
> >
> > In the course of preparing for tomorrow's call, including discussions
> > with the Co-Chairs of the CWG and other subgroup leads, it was decided
> > that a preferred course of action would be to prepare three "Strawman
> > Proposals" rather than a single "Framework Document" with multiple
> > variables. These three Strawman Proposals are attached. The
> proposals
> > are organized on a consistent outline, largely taken from the
> > "Variables" document. This will allow us to consider the
> proposals both
> > "vertically" and "horizontally" (i.e., across the documents), and to
> > swap sections as we move toward the ultimate deliverable of a single
> > proposal. The proposals are intended to capture most of the major
> > alternatives discussed on this list, the CWG list, and in our
> calls, as
> > well as in other documents circulated in the community. However, if a
> > particular alternative has not been captured in any proposal, that
> does
> > not mean that it is "dead" or even disfavored. Similarly, I expect
> > there will be additional issues to be considered in any proposal, and
> > these should be captured as well, either on the call or thereafter.
> >
> >
> >
> > I apologize for the lateness of the hour; I hope you will see that the
> > alternatives are not unfamiliar, even if they are now repackaged in
> > proposal form. In our call tomorrow morning, I would like to
> review and
> > work through these proposals in lieu of items 2 and 3 of the
> agenda. In
> > the course of that review, we should aim to consider pro's and con's,
> > which will be added to a document during our call, and then posted or
> > circulated for further editing. I expect that the Strawman Proposals
> > will be similarly posted or circulated.
> >
> >
> >
> > I look forward to our call.
> >
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > Greg
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Grace Abuhamad
> > <grace.abuhamad at icann.org <mailto:grace.abuhamad at icann.org>
> <mailto:grace.abuhamad at icann.org <mailto:grace.abuhamad at icann.org>>>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
> >
> > Here is the proposed agenda for the RFP3 subgroup meeting on Wednesday:
> >
> > 1. Welcome and Roll Call
> > 2. Review of Variables Document (link here
> >
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/10PIySH4OEdebff1lU7foynDe8S3PZEvjG2W_UCpJamM/edit?usp=sharing>)
> > 3. Review of Framework Document (to be circulated before call)
> > 4. Live-Editing of Pros and Cons Document (to be circulated
> before
> > call)
> > 5. Thoughts on this sub-group on how best to use time in
> Frankfurt
> > 6. Assignments for fleshing out parts of Framework Document
> > 7. AOB
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Grace
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Cwg-rfp3 mailing list
> > Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org <mailto:Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org>
> <mailto:Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org <mailto:Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org>>
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp3
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Cwg-rfp3 mailing list
> > Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org <mailto:Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org>
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp3
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Cwg-rfp3 mailing list
> Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org <mailto:Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp3
>
>
More information about the Cwg-rfp3
mailing list