[CWG-RFP3] Seperabilty

Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond ocl at gih.com
Mon Nov 24 08:20:10 UTC 2014


Dear Avri,
Dear Milton,

On 24/11/2014 05:11, Avri Doria wrote:
> 1. Strong separability: every n (n= 2-7?) years a new RFP is released
> and all comers, current contract holder included, apply for the IANA
> contract and the best candidate is picked. 
>
> 2. Weak seperability: every n (n=2-7?) years a review of the current
> contract holder is reviewed and the review committee has the option to
> put out an RFP for the IANA contract if there are unresolved issues.

What I heard at the face to face meeting is that the directly affected
customers were looking for operational stability and therefore preferred
option 2. My understanding was that consensus was found at 2 rather than 1.
Kind regards,

Olivier


More information about the Cwg-rfp3 mailing list