[CWG-RFP3] Revised Survey

Greg Shatan gregshatanipc at gmail.com
Sat Jan 3 16:08:12 UTC 2015


I like Milton's suggestion.  The attached final draft "accepts" all of the
redlines in the previous version, cleans up a few typos, and adds Milton's
suggestion (in redline to show the change).  I'm going to suggest that this
should be finalized and put up as as online survey as soon as possible.

Greg

On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:

>  Greg:
>
>
>
> The survey has been improved very much. I can live with it as is.
>
> I have only one suggestion. I was very happy to see that the text now
> clarifies that “Neither Agree nor Disagree should be used for statements
> that you believe you (or your group) can live with.” Why not just describe
> the option that way to begin with? (i.e., make “can live with it” the
> middle option rather than describing it as “Neither Agree nor Disagree” and
> then clarifying what it means?)
>
>
>
> *From:* cwg-rfp3-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-rfp3-bounces at icann.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Greg Shatan
> *Sent:* Saturday, January 3, 2015 2:44 AM
> *To:* RFP3
> *Subject:* [CWG-RFP3] Revised Survey
>
>
>
> With apologies for the delay, here's a revised version of the survey we
> discussed on the most recent call.  Please provide comments ASAP.
>
> Greg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-rfp3/attachments/20150103/4f9998c1/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Final Draft IANA CWG Survey Questions for the CSC  MRT clean with MM Suggestion.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 29214 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-rfp3/attachments/20150103/4f9998c1/FinalDraftIANACWGSurveyQuestionsfortheCSCMRTcleanwithMMSuggestion-0001.docx>


More information about the Cwg-rfp3 mailing list