[CWG-RFP3] Revised Survey

[Milton L Mueller]

I don't think individuals should be discounted.

But even if you eliminate the individuals the numbers don't change that much. There were 9 individual comments, only 7 took a clear position on separability; of those 7 one favored the internal solution and 6 expressed support for some form of external separability. Taking them out doesn't move the needle much. If the support for basic model goes down to 62% are you still saying we have a basis for rejecting completely the CWG draft in favor of an option supported by only 25%?



From: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond [mailto:ocl at gih.com]
Sent: Monday, January 5, 2015 3:58 AM
To: Milton L Mueller; 'Steve Crocker'
Cc: 'RFP3'
Subject: Re: [CWG-RFP3] Revised Survey


On 04/01/2015 23:13, Milton L Mueller wrote:
MM: Steve, when are you doing to stop ignoring the simple fact that 67% of the public comments DO accept the basic model proposed by the CWG? For the survey to ask questions about how that model can be refined in a manner that retains the most support is quite reasonable.

That's taking all comments on an equal level - when we all know that organisational comments have a lot more weight than that of individuals. I wouldn't rely on this flawed statistic.

Regards,

Olivier
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-rfp3/attachments/20150105/a550aecc/attachment.html>