[CWG-RFP3] Revised Survey

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

The request was whether there were any examples of such behavior.  Goes
to establishing a pattern of possible behavior.

The request was not for specific example related to IANA.  Currently it
is very hard to know where IANA ends and ICANN begins as we really don't
have any sort of internal seperation.

avri

On 16-Jan-15 11:36, Steve Crocker wrote:
> Avri, Chuck, et al,
>
> Thanks.  These are all relevant and useful examples that fit well into
> the Accountability track.  I don't see their relevance with respect to
> the proper operation of the IANA function. 
>
> Steve
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jan 16, 2015, at 11:21 AM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org
> <mailto:avri at acm.org>> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> An additional example is  the Trademark Clearing House (TMCH) and
>> especially TMCH+50, which  were instituted contrary to  PDP
>> recommendations and without a proper community process.
>>
>> The Public Interest Commitments (PICs) are another new gTLD feature,
>> perhaps a good and necessary idea, but one that was ill formed and
>> created without community input.
>>
>> avri
>>
>> On 16-Jan-15 08:03, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>>>
>>> David,
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> The introduction of the unilateral right to amend gTLD registry
>>> agreements is a key example.  This was re-added to the new gTLD
>>> registry agreements just before new gTLDs were going to be added and
>>> after community agreement had resolved the issue a couple years
>>> earlier.  This was primarily a staff action but presumably the Board
>>> supported it.
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> Chuck
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> *From:*cwg-rfp3-bounces at icann.org
>>> [mailto:cwg-rfp3-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *David Conrad
>>> *Sent:* Monday, January 05, 2015 12:47 AM
>>> *To:* Seun Ojedeji
>>> *Cc:* RFP3
>>> *Subject:* Re: [CWG-RFP3] Revised Survey
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> I've asked this before and gotten no response, so I'll try again.
>>>
>>>     It's been said that there are times when the board does not
>>>     abide by community developed policies and where board could also
>>>     spring up it's own policy without achieving community consensus.
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> Could someone point to the historical record for these?  I'm
>>> honestly curious.
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> -drc
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Cwg-rfp3 mailing list
>>> Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp3
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cwg-rfp3 mailing list
>> Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org <mailto:Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp3

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-rfp3/attachments/20150117/8beb1684/attachment.html>