[CWG-RFP3] Revised Survey

[Donna Austin]

Seun

>From a gTLD perspective its a pretty clear line. I don't understand your comment about bottlenecks.

Donna

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 17, 2015, at 5:08 AM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com<mailto:seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>> wrote:


sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 17 Jan 2015 13:40, "Chris Disspain" <ceo at auda.org.au<mailto:ceo at auda.org.au>> wrote:
>
> Avri,
>
>> Currently it is very hard to know where IANA ends and ICANN begins
>
>
> I disagree. As a ccTLD manger I have very clear understanding of where IANA begins and ends.
>
I would expect numbers and protocol to also have such clear understanding as above. It would then seem Avri's comment is only referring to the Gs' which is the bottleneck in this process as far as the names proposal is concerned.

Cheers!

> I'm about to take off from Melbourne for Frankfurt. More from me when I land.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Chris
>
> On 17 Jan 2015, at 23:15, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org<mailto:avri at acm.org>> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The request was whether there were any examples of such behavior.  Goes to establishing a pattern of possible behavior.
>>
>> The request was not for specific example related to IANA.  Currently it is very hard to know where IANA ends and ICANN begins as we really don't have any sort of internal seperation.
>>
>> avri
>>
>> On 16-Jan-15 11:36, Steve Crocker wrote:
>>>
>>> Avri, Chuck, et al,
>>>
>>> Thanks.  These are all relevant and useful examples that fit well into the Accountability track.  I don't see their relevance with respect to the proper operation of the IANA function.
>>>
>>> Steve
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On Jan 16, 2015, at 11:21 AM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org<mailto:avri at acm.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> An additional example is  the Trademark Clearing House (TMCH) and especially TMCH+50, which  were instituted contrary to  PDP recommendations and without a proper community process.
>>>>
>>>> The Public Interest Commitments (PICs) are another new gTLD feature, perhaps a good and necessary idea, but one that was ill formed and created without community input.
>>>>
>>>> avri
>>>>
>>>> On 16-Jan-15 08:03, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> David,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The introduction of the unilateral right to amend gTLD registry agreements is a key example.  This was re-added to the new gTLD registry agreements just before new gTLDs were going to be added and after community agreement had resolved the issue a couple years earlier.  This was primarily a staff action but presumably the Board supported it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Chuck
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> From: cwg-rfp3-bounces at icann.org<mailto:cwg-rfp3-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:cwg-rfp3-bounces at icann.org<mailto:cwg-rfp3-bounces at icann.org>] On Behalf Of David Conrad
>>>>> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 12:47 AM
>>>>> To: Seun Ojedeji
>>>>> Cc: RFP3
>>>>> Subject: Re: [CWG-RFP3] Revised Survey
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I've asked this before and gotten no response, so I'll try again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's been said that there are times when the board does not abide by community developed policies and where board could also spring up it's own policy without achieving community consensus.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Could someone point to the historical record for these?  I'm honestly curious.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> -drc
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Cwg-rfp3 mailing list
>>>>> Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org<mailto:Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org>
>>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp3
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Cwg-rfp3 mailing list
>>>> Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org<mailto:Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org>
>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp3
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cwg-rfp3 mailing list
>> Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org<mailto:Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp3
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cwg-rfp3 mailing list
> Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org<mailto:Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp3
>

_______________________________________________
Cwg-rfp3 mailing list
Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org<mailto:Cwg-rfp3 at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp3
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-rfp3/attachments/20150117/ac6ac9be/attachment.html>