<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Greg Shatan <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com" target="_blank">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I suppose there has been some discussion of putting IANA, Inc. in a different jurisdiction -- which goes back to the original question of what jurisdictional concerns do stakeholders actually have?</blockquote></div><br><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:'comic sans ms',sans-serif;font-size:large">You got that right! And it stems from the common and sustained political undercurrent to this entire debate, what some bluntly - and maybe intemperately - refer as 'US control'. This is what makes separability and jurisdiction like conjoined twins; one goes everywhere with the other until you decided to maybe sacrifice one or other.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:'comic sans ms',sans-serif;font-size:large"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:'comic sans ms',sans-serif;font-size:large">To dismiss - or rather ignore - it will not let it go away. And, naysaying does violence to reason.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:'comic sans ms',sans-serif;font-size:large"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:'comic sans ms',sans-serif;font-size:large">-Carlton </div><br><br clear="all"><div><div class="gmail_signature"><br>==============================<br>Carlton A Samuels<br>Mobile: 876-818-1799<br><i><font color="#33CC00">Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround</font></i><br>=============================</div></div>
</div></div>