<div dir="ltr"><div>Alan,<br><br>Ordered by whom? Under what circumstances?<br><br></div>Thanks.<br><br>Greg<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Alan Greenberg <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca" target="_blank">alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>
An issue I raised earlier: If IANA were a wholly owned subsidiary of
ICANN incorporated in ANY jurisdiction, I suspect (but do not know) that
ICANN, which is subject to US law, might be ordered to have its
subsidiary take some action, negating the benefits of its incorporation
and residence elsewhere.<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br><br>
Alan</font></span><div><div class="h5"><br><br>
At 03/11/2014 11:33 AM, Greg Shatan wrote:<br>
</div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div class="h5">All:<br><br>
Here is Robert's second question (which I think also applies to the
concept of a fully independent IANA): <br><br>
<font color="#0000FF"><b>For option #2.<br><br>
- Is there is a jurisdiction that ICANN has (or can obtain) legal
status might be more suitable to use to create IANA as a subsidiary. Such
an option might allow for the link to be a subsidiary of ICANN, but sever
the legal link to the US. A negative, of course, would be moving the
function and existing staff to a new part of the
world.</b></font><br><br>
Comments and discussion?<br><br>
Greg<br></div></div><span class="">
_______________________________________________<br>
Cwg-rfp3 mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Cwg-rfp3@icann.org" target="_blank">Cwg-rfp3@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp3" target="_blank">
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp3</a></span></blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>