<div dir="ltr">All:<div><br></div><div>In the course of preparing for tomorrow's call, including discussions with the Co-Chairs of the CWG and other subgroup leads, it was decided that a preferred course of action would be to prepare three "Strawman Proposals" rather than a single "Framework Document" with multiple variables. These three Strawman Proposals are attached. The proposals are organized on a consistent outline, largely taken from the "Variables" document. This will allow us to consider the proposals both "vertically" and "horizontally" (i.e., across the documents), and to swap sections as we move toward the ultimate deliverable of a single proposal. The proposals are intended to capture most of the major alternatives discussed on this list, the CWG list, and in our calls, as well as in other documents circulated in the community. However, if a particular alternative has not been captured in any proposal, that does not mean that it is "dead" or even disfavored. Similarly, I expect there will be additional issues to be considered in any proposal, and these should be captured as well, either on the call or thereafter.</div><div><br></div><div>I apologize for the lateness of the hour; I hope you will see that the alternatives are not unfamiliar, even if they are now repackaged in proposal form. In our call tomorrow morning, I would like to review and work through these proposals in lieu of items 2 and 3 of the agenda. In the course of that review, we should aim to consider pro's and con's, which will be added to a document during our call, and then posted or circulated for further editing. I expect that the Strawman Proposals will be similarly posted or circulated.</div><div><br></div><div>I look forward to our call.</div><div><br></div><div>Best regards,</div><div><br></div><div>Greg</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Grace Abuhamad <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org" target="_blank">grace.abuhamad@icann.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-size:14px;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><div>Hi all,</div><div><br></div><div>Here is the proposed agenda for the RFP3 subgroup meeting on Wednesday: </div><ol><li>Welcome and Roll Call</li><li>Review of Variables Document (link <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/10PIySH4OEdebff1lU7foynDe8S3PZEvjG2W_UCpJamM/edit?usp=sharing" target="_blank">here</a>)</li><li>Review of Framework Document (to be circulated before call)</li><li>Live-Editing of Pros and Cons Document (to be circulated before call)</li><li>Thoughts on this sub-group on how best to use time in Frankfurt</li><li>Assignments for fleshing out parts of Framework Document </li><li>AOB</li></ol><div>Best, </div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div>Grace</div></font></span></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Cwg-rfp3 mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Cwg-rfp3@icann.org">Cwg-rfp3@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp3" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp3</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>