<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    Dear Guru,<br>
    <br>
    I'll let our Chairs decide on whether there was consensus or no
    consensus, bearing in mind consensus is not unanimity.<br>
    Kind regards,<br>
    <br>
    Olivier<br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 24/11/2014 10:35, Guru Acharya
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAEEwkf70HHtw3pkGXSsO=kgP_0Byd-3SxEfgmyeOjK-coLj65g@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">Olivier,
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>I don't agree that consensus was found on Option 2.</div>
        <div>Malcolm and Matthew strongly objected to Option 2 as
          reflected in the transcripts.</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Please read <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/49363373/MeetingF2F_Session3_20Nov.doc?version=1&amp;modificationDate=1416525744000&amp;api=v2">https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/49363373/MeetingF2F_Session3_20Nov.doc?version=1&amp;modificationDate=1416525744000&amp;api=v2</a></div>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 1:50 PM,
          Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a
              moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:ocl@gih.com"
              target="_blank">ocl@gih.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Dear Avri,<br>
            Dear Milton,<br>
            <span class=""><br>
              On 24/11/2014 05:11, Avri Doria wrote:<br>
              &gt; 1. Strong separability: every n (n= 2-7?) years a new
              RFP is released<br>
              &gt; and all comers, current contract holder included,
              apply for the IANA<br>
              &gt; contract and the best candidate is picked.<br>
              &gt;<br>
              &gt; 2. Weak seperability: every n (n=2-7?) years a review
              of the current<br>
              &gt; contract holder is reviewed and the review committee
              has the option to<br>
              &gt; put out an RFP for the IANA contract if there are
              unresolved issues.<br>
              <br>
            </span>What I heard at the face to face meeting is that the
            directly affected<br>
            customers were looking for operational stability and
            therefore preferred<br>
            option 2. My understanding was that consensus was found at 2
            rather than 1.<br>
            Kind regards,<br>
            <br>
            Olivier<br>
            <div class="HOEnZb">
              <div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
                Cwg-rfp3 mailing list<br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:Cwg-rfp3@icann.org">Cwg-rfp3@icann.org</a><br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp3"
                  target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-rfp3</a><br>
              </div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.gih.com/ocl.html">http://www.gih.com/ocl.html</a>
</pre>
  </body>
</html>