[CWG-Stewardship] Do we really need a Contracting Co.?
Milton L Mueller
mueller at syr.edu
Mon Dec 1 15:31:19 UTC 2014
>On another topic, it concerns me that our draft document seems to have buried the notion of the periodic >RFP. RFP is listed on page 30, but Annex 3 seems to avoid mention at all. and even in section 3, there is no >notion of a periodic RFC, just the fact that there can be one. I believe that without a peridoic RFP for the >IANA contract there can be no accountability for the IANA function at ICANN or anywhere else for that >matter - and this is not something that can be remedied by the CCSG Accountability. The IETF and the RIRs >can walk away from ICANN if they are ever unhappy. The Names community needs the ability to move the >IANA contract elsewhere as well. Whether the contract is held in 'trust' for us by ISOC or Company Co. >matters less to me that it be held externally.
>
>avri
That concerns me, too. We had extensive discussion of the periodicity issue and seem to agree on a contract period of around 5 years. This needs to be incorporated into the draft.
Milton L. Mueller
Laura J. and L. Douglas Meredith Professor
Syracuse University School of Information Studies
http://faculty.ischool.syr.edu/mueller/mueller/Home.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141201/10a6b8fe/attachment.html>
More information about the CWG-Stewardship
mailing list