[CWG-Stewardship] Composition of MRT

[Grace Abuhamad]

Hi all, 

We looked into this and noted that the Continuity & Contingency Plan is
confidential and cannot be distributed.

Notes, transcripts, and recordings for RFP4 call are available here:
https://community.icann.org/x/MYcQAw

Best, 
Grace

From:  Guru Acharya <gurcharya at gmail.com>
Date:  Wednesday, December 17, 2014 8:05 AM
To:  Avri Doria <avri at acm.org>
Cc:  "cwg-stewardship at icann.org" <cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
Subject:  Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Composition of MRT

Hi Avri,

This was an action item for the staff from the call on 25th November. I
believe they have already put in a request for the document with the IANA
staff. Maybe Grace or Marika can update us on the request.

"ACTION staff : Ask IANA staff to share details on 7.3 that might be
available for the public and/or online"

On 17 Dec 2014 17:29, "Avri Doria" <avri at acm.org> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Is that 'transition to a "successor  contractor" plan' available to the CWG?
> 
> avri
> 
> On 17-Dec-14 05:26, Matthew Shears wrote:
>> Alan 
>> 
>> Section C.7 in the current contract addresses issues of continuity of
>> operations - particularly C.7.3, according to which ICANN should have a
>> transition to a "successor
>> contractor" plan in place at the moment
>> 
>> Matthew 
>> 
>> On 12/17/2014 3:38 AM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
>>> As someone whose ICANN 'job" is supporting/defending the needs of Internet
>>> users, I will point out that security and stability of the IANA functions is
>>> of paramount importance for the ALAC as well.
>>> 
>>> I look forward to the seeing how that can be assured in a potentially
>>> disruptive switch of the IANA operator where it may be that there is no
>>> continuity of either staff or systems.
>>> 
>>> Alan 
>>> 
>>> At 15/12/2014 03:16 PM, Donna Austin wrote:
>>> 
>>>> All 
>>>> 
>>>> I largely agree with Christopher. I think we are creating complexity where
>>>> it does not necessarily need to be, but as we are here I want to reiterate
>>>> a few comments I made on the RFP 3 call earlier today, and these comments
>>>> come from a gTLD registry operator perspective:
>>>> 
>>>> ·         Operational stability and reliability of the IANA service is
>>>> imperative to the business operations of registry operators and as such
>>>> this should be a critical consideration in any discussions.
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>>> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
> 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141218/a1cc31d2/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5097 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141218/a1cc31d2/smime.p7s>