[CWG-Stewardship] Composition of MRT
Alan Greenberg
alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Thu Dec 18 04:42:08 UTC 2014
Balanced MS representation is essential. Although
the MRT is not a policy setting body, it IS a
policy enforcing body and as such, it needs balanced representation. Alan
At 17/12/2014 09:04 AM, Lindeberg, Elise wrote:
>Dear all,
>
>I agree with the comments from Milton, Lise and
>Dona on a flexible solution and avoiding
>swelling out of proportions - but I donât see
>an argument for registries (ccs and gs) having
>greater rather than equal representation on the
>MRT. The CWG is working on the basis of a model
>with a distinction between the Customer Standing
>Committee (CSC) - who will evaluating IANA
>reports and performance of the IANA function for
>the community at large, based on a direct
>customer relationship and the Multistakeholder
>Review team (MRT), who need to be real
>Multistakeholder with en equally balanced
>representation from the community at large.
>Operational stability, reliability of the IANA
>service and the actual placing of the IANA
>function is of the outmost importance for the whole community.
>
>Best
>
>Elise
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141217/c1ee9ac9/attachment.html>
More information about the CWG-Stewardship
mailing list