[CWG-Stewardship] Meeting #5 - Quick comments

[Gomes, Chuck]

Thanks Robert.  I personally think that both of your suggestions are good.  If no one objects, I suggest that Staff make both edits in the Section 2A draft.

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Robert Guerra
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 10:25 AM
To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] Meeting #5 - Quick comments

In regards to the call just now. Let me repeat a couple of comments that I made in the chat:

Many thanks to Chuck and Kieren for their work on Sec 1 & 2A. The tables and processes outlined are very clear, and helpful to better understand which processes where IANA / NTIA are - and are not - involved.

It is a  great doc/summary. Overview & history is mentioned in ssac advisory 67 - https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/sac-067-en.pdf . 


- for 2.6. Would ssac 067 be helpful to add as an  additional reference ?
- for DRP’s listed, curious if board reconsideration appeal fits anywhere?