[CWG-Stewardship] Statement by JNC on IANA transition

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

He was encouraged to join the list by several of us.  But he found the
conditions in the charter unacceptable and has opted for this alternate
path, as provided by the ICG.

avri

On 10-Nov-14 18:48, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> Milton,
>
> I personally think it would be much better if the ICG encouraged the JNC to have a representative participate in the IANA CWG rather than forward a very long and generic document to the CWG and expect those who are committing long hours of time already taking additional long hours to decipher the JNC comments and trying to fit them in to CWG work.  If they had a representative on the CWG as participant, that person could better express JNC positions than any of us could and would be allowed to participate fully except when it comes to directly deciding consensus.
>
> Chuck
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Milton L Mueller
> Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 11:54 AM
> To: 'cwg-stewardship at icann.org'
> Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] Statement by JNC on IANA transition
>
> With my ICG member hat on, I am conveying a comment we received to this group, at their request
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/icg-forum/msg00009.html    
>
> Milton L. Mueller
> Laura J. and L. Douglas Meredith Professor Syracuse University School of Information Studies http://faculty.ischool.syr.edu/mueller/mueller/Home.html 
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141110/1e68fea3/attachment-0001.html>