[CWG-Stewardship] FW: FW: CWG RFP2B Proposal

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

Apologies, guess I picked the wrong email.  I hope I can be forgiven for
this sin.

I guess that means that my viewpoints will just be ignored.

But if this group is able to decide that multistakeholder models are not
applicable, no matter which thread an email is attached to. I think we
may be in more trouble than I think we are.  Are you saying we have
consensus on a principle against commitment to the multistakeholder
model?  How can that be when the multistakeholder model is really one of
the first principles we much meet for an NTIA solution

avri

On 14-Nov-14 22:48, Guru Acharya wrote:
> Avri - You got the wrong thread. This thread is for RFP2B and not the
> principles.
>
> And your suggested principle for a multi-stakeholder composition of the
> oversight council appears to be in contradiction to Strawman 1 and ignores
> the range of discussions that happened on this list about the composition.
>
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 6:13 AM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>
>>  Hi,
>>
>> I have suggested a few edits to the doc.  hope I did it in the mandated
>> manner.
>>
>> the changes refer to
>>
>> - transparency and requirements that any and all audit reports be
>> published.
>> - bottom-up modalities
>> - multistakeholder nature of any committee or oversight arrangements.
>>
>> Hope I did not mess up any of the formatting.
>>
>> avri
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>
>>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141115/8a7709f1/attachment.html>