[CWG-Stewardship] Communication with numbers and protocol parameters groups

[Milton L Mueller]

Actually I don’t think it would be anything but a distraction at this point. What this group needs to do is develop a proposal based on the ICG RFP. I am conversant with what is happening in the protocol parameters community and could liaise with them, but it is hard for me to see how a ‘horizontal channel’ to that would help you develop a proposal. Of course, if, during the development of a proposal, specific questions arise about its compatibility with the protocol parameters IANA or the numbers IANA, then we can reach out to them. But for now, you just need to develop a proposal regarding the DNS root and the end of NTIA’s role in overseeing that.

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Greg Shatan
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 11:33 AM
To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] Communication with numbers and protocol parameters groups


All:

Are there people in this group who are in a position to liaise with, coordinate with and/or provide information to and from the other two groups preparing responses for their respective communities?

I think opening a "horizontal" channel would be most helpful in our work.

Greg Shatan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141016/7ad59b7f/attachment.html>