[CWG-Stewardship] Notes and action items from F2F meeting

[Milton L Mueller]

Chuck
Every chartering organization is represented on the CWG. What stops you from having all participants, including people within the so-called chartering organizations, provide public comment on a "last call" proposal at the same time? Why must every organization run a separate process to formally "adopt" a proposal when their representatives are the ones who made the proposal? Why duplicate process?

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck

Regarding the timeline, as I stated in our in-person meeting in L.A., I have concerns about the feasibility of the next to last step (Adoption by chartering organizations of final transition proposal) being done in 11 days.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141018/3ebb36b8/attachment.html>