[CWG-Stewardship] Comments on principles

[Seun Ojedeji]

I think those are defined in the NTIA requirement with perhaps the biggest
one being the no  governmental/intergovernmental replacement.

Cheers!

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 23 Oct 2014 01:55, "Fouad Bajwa" <fouadbajwa at gmail.com> wrote:

> Is it possible to understand what are the boundaries or limits of the
> IANA contract that should not be crossed at all in the transition
> design? I am thinking from outward to inwards...
>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 1:30 AM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I see at least 1 other category and another entry for the Accountabilty
> > category
> >
> >
> > the new Category is Separability.
> >
> > In order to reproduce the NTIA contract, it has to be possible for the
> > Naming policy groups of ICANN to become dissatisfied and move the
> contract
> > for the function elsewhere.  This is the correlate of the IETF
> capability.
> > Other principles such as stabilty  mean this can't just happen willy
> nilly,
> > but there must be some sort of periodic opportunity this to happen.  Or
> > perhaps a 6 month clause like the IETF has.  while there are several
> ways to
> > do this, I think it critical that the plan include the possiblity and the
> > means.
> >
> > And the new bullets in accountability
> >
> > - There needs to be a mechanism for an enforceable means of redress.
> > Whether it is achieved by binding arbitration, some sort of juridical
> system
> > or a yet to be named capability, it has to be possible for there to be an
> > accessible and relaible mean of redress.
> >
> > - We need to decide to whom it is accountable.  The stakeholders?  The
> > policy process? the registries? the registrants? the users?
> Accountabilty
> > must be accountabilty to someone.  I beleive it is the stakeholders, but
> > that probably needs to be further defined.  Do we mean the multiplicity
> of
> > stakeholder groups ICANN has?  Or do we mean to a Tunis Agenda model of
> > stakeholders?  Some other model?
> >
> >
> > The answers to the principle questions will say a lot about the kind of
> > solution we might come up with.
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > avri
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> > CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards.
> --------------------------
> Fouad Bajwa
> ICT4D and Internet Governance Advisor
> My Blog: Internet's Governance: http://internetsgovernance.blogspot.com/
> Follow my Tweets: http://twitter.com/fouadbajwa
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141023/df4cfeae/attachment-0001.html>