[CWG-Stewardship] Financing the new IANA

[Seun Ojedeji]

Hmm... just to further understand the practicality of this. So the new IANA
(names part of the functions) will be funded by the registries right. Well
i have a few set of questions below:

- How does/will something like newgTLD process look like? I.e will ICANN
accredit or the new entity?
- What exactly will the new entity be doing?
- What will ICANN's new role be? I am assuming PDP (based on IGP) if that
is the case it means the new entity will work on the ICANN's community
developed policy right? And how does that improve accountability.
- Who determine what staff to employ for the new entity? I presume there
will then be a need for board of Directors, bylaw, membership etc.
- Is the new entity going to be established in any country?
- What will the composition of such new entities board look like? cctld,
gtld, end-users?
- Who will generally oversee the accountability of the new entity?
- Who/what determines how the funds is shared between ICANN and the new
entity?

Cheers!

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 24 Oct 2014 14:55, "James Gannon" <james at cyberinvasion.net> wrote:

>  I think in the case of using the same funding sources that it currently
> has within ICANN that, it would be important to structure it so as those
> funds would be payed directly to the IANA entity directly and not via
> revenue directed from within ICANN.
> The separation would be needed for accountability and to pre-empt any
> conflict of interest in my opinion.
>
>  James
>
>  On 24 Oct 2014, at 12:45, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org> wrote:
>
>  Hi,
>
>  The issue of financing the new IANA was addressed in the IGP paper (
> http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2408226) in very much
> the same way Eduardo suggests. I also think it sounds pretty reasonable. If
> current financing of IANA comes from the revenues accrued by ICANN from
> domain name registrations and paid by TLD registries, then that portion of
> the revenue used to finance IANA now can be redirected to whatever the new
> IANA might be.
>
>  Thanks.
>
>  Amr
>
>  On Oct 24, 2014, at 6:16 AM, Eduardo Diaz <eduardodiazrivera at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>  Robert:
>
>  It will depend: if the final option is to keep the function under the
> ICANN umbrella, then my understanding is that ICANN will keep financing it.
> On the other hand, if it is moved outside ICANN, then i presume it can be
> supported by all entities requiring its services.
>
>  -ed
>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Robert Guerra <rguerra at privaterra.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Curious if the question of how the "new" IANA would be financed has been
>> asked ?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> _______________________________________________
>> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>
>
>
>
>  --
> *NOTICE:* This email may contain information which is confidential and/or
> subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named
> addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use,
> disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by
> mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately.
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141025/0d8b1d37/attachment.html>